My eyes are wide open. The problem thus far has been that the "evidence" presented by the anti-vaccine side has been nothing but innuendo (e.g. "it COULD be dangerous!"), insinuation (e.g. "just wait and you'll see how bad the vaccines are!"), unsubstantiated claims (e.g. "Hank Aaron died of a COVID-19 vaccine!" - hint: no he didn't, not according to the medical examiner), and outright ridiculous nonsense (e.g. "the vaccines contain Bill Gates mind control chips/alien DNA/sterilizing agents", etc.)
But to date, you really have nothing. Zero proof of any real safety issue. Zero medical investigations of any deaths where a COVID-19 vaccine turned out to be the cause. Zero. Out of 110,000,000 vaccinated Americans. Zero horns growing out of vaccine recipients' heads. Zero third arms. Zero evidence of any significant negative impacts. Just a lot of hot air intended to scare people.
The hugest lie to escape your lips yet.
Well, go big or go home, I always say.
“But to date, you really have nothing. Zero proof of any real safety issue. Zero medical investigations of any deaths where a COVID-19 vaccine turned out to be the cause.”
OK.
How do we establish causality, or non-causality at many levels without very detailed before and after monitoring/testing of both the vaccinated and placebo controlled group? The placebo MUST be something completely inert, such as saline, in order to be valid. And the monitoring needs to be deep (say ongoing blood work, organic test etc). mRNA is a new tech, so it would stand to reason that we need a LOT of double blind placebo control data.
No more of this gold standard BS. Vaccines are almost all tested using faux placebos (meaning other vax, or adjuvants).