How many PHD's does his wife have. Did she perform the autopsy on the kitchen table? My, how your standards of 'evidence have slipped.
Takes a doctor for Aaron, and a wife for Hagler.
I see, professor.
How many PHD's does his wife have. Did she perform the autopsy on the kitchen table? My, how your standards of 'evidence have slipped.
Takes a doctor for Aaron, and a wife for Hagler.
I see, professor.
Have any doctors or medical examiners who examined Marvin Hagler’s body contradicted his wife’s assertions? Presumably, she has more access to his medical history and the determination of the doctors working her husband’s case than any random Youtuber or blogger.
So why take their word (which is pure speculation without any access to medical information) over the word of the grieving widow who has access to ALL the medical information on his death?
Why is the wild and unsubstantiated Internet blogger claim more credible than the words of the man’s own wife? Is it because that wild and unsubstantiated blogger claim fits with a narrative you want badly to be true?