ok
I see where you’re going with this, and I stepped into your spider trap. I wthdraw the ‘dumbass ‘ comment.
I am heartened to know that you accept the data because the other 2 excess heat points on the graph are inexplicable with modern chemistry. If you accept that one point on the graph then you are intellectually obligated to accept others.
The solution to commercialization is then obvious: don’t use 305 Watts input, use the lower inputs and then stack the devices.
“The solution to commercialization is then obvious: don’t use 305 Watts input, use the lower inputs and then stack the devices.”
Is water used as the ‘coolant’?
What temperature?
How big is the unit?
“If you accept that one point on the graph then you are intellectually obligated to accept others.”
Nope. Just saying the graph doesn’t support commercialization.
“The solution to commercialization is then obvious: don’t use 305 Watts input, use the lower inputs and then stack the devices.
So, you put in 105 w and get 110 w output in warm air. Not ready for commercialization!