Good point.
Interesting some people like to use “correlation does not equal causation” like a bludgeon, as if it magically removes all possibility the adverse events reported are related to the vaccine. Correlation is a logically appropriate place to start. That’s why VAERS exists.
These "vaccines" in no-way are tested nor proven safe. This is why the FDA classifies them as experimental. Do you think the drug companies would be producing and distributing millions of doses if they weren't protected from liability by the "experimental" moniker? That alone should tell you everything you need to know about these vaccines.
Yes, they are apparently nominally effective, though there is conflicting information as to whether vaccinated people can still carry/transmit the virus. Yes, they may be effective for months or years - unknown at this time if or how often boosters will be required. Yes, they may be effective, or not, against variants of the virus - conflicting reports on this too. Gosh it's almost like we don't know much about these... They may be safe, or there may be long-term side effects that don't show up for months or years. We don't know because no-one has had them for years, only the tiniest fraction of people have had it for up to 1 year.
To me the idea of putting 100 million or more people into a brand new medication trial is insane and reckless to the point of negligence. Particularly in light of the apparent survival rates for most demographics that might catch the virus. I hope everything turns out ok, or at least reasonably ok - the vaccines work and don't cause too much pain and suffering. But it is also likely, given our history with trying new things, that there will be some horrible consequences too this rash action. I hope they are not too widespread.