Number of COVID vaccine injuries reported to VAERS surpasses 50,000, CDC data show

Children's Defense Fund via NOQ Report ^ | 04/05/2021

[dynoman]

Read post 57.

[SgtHooper]

“A brick falling on someone’s head should not be recorded in VAERS.”

Not necessarily. If the person’s mental state, body functions, etc., were so impacted by the vaccination, to the extent that they could not appreciate the danger or risk of a falling brick in a construction zone, it should be reported. A nexus between the vaccination and the cause of the injury could be made.

[bagster]

I’m going to pray for you Bagster.

How sweet.

Declined. Send money instead.

You got plenty. Send me a cut of the profits from this.

Patient Influencers Paid By Pharmaceutical Companies Should Be Required To Disclose Industry Ties

(excerpt)

Not only are micro-influencers persuasive, they apparently come cheap: According to this article micro-influencers “are more cost-effective partners to work with, increasing the brands’ ability to and [sic] maximize ROI [return on investment]. …with micro-influencers, the opportunity is as real as the stories they have to tell.”

The only reason not to believe you may be a paid 'micro influencer' is that you're not persuasive. But not everybody can be a success story like that 2a guy.

Cash only, please and thankQ.

[bagster]

Bags, you should know that it’s not a proper vaccine. It’s experimental mRNA therapy.

It is known.

[dynoman]

“The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.”

What people say about that quote is not proof that a vaccine DID NOT cause the adverse event either. The way some here talk we should blow off all the reported adverse event and reaction reports. The shear volume of reports in such a short time with the covid vaccines should be concerning. The VAERS report for the all the diphtheria vaccines grouped together shows 482 deaths from DECADES of them being used, many millions more than covid vaccines. A week ago covid vaccines hit 3.38 times that number - in five months.

As Elon Musk would say, “something bogus is going on.”

[dynoman]

LOL!!

[bagster]

He’s a genius compared to the “shock horror the sky is falling” tin foil hat brigade.

Then that puts him miles above the government drones hyping this fake vax like its their job.

But really, 'old people die' even I figured out when I was twelve.

[Jane Long]

You busted the paid, troll/vax influencers, bags!!

Good work!

[ThunderSleeps]

Agreed. I don't think trials on approximately 43,000 people (one vaccine's trial pool) for up to 1 year represents "tested" and safe. That is only 0.013% of the population of the US, no-where near the typical 10 to 15 year vaccine development cycle, and 2 of the 3 are based on brand new, never before put into widespread use mRNA technology.

These "vaccines" in no-way are tested nor proven safe. This is why the FDA classifies them as experimental. Do you think the drug companies would be producing and distributing millions of doses if they weren't protected from liability by the "experimental" moniker? That alone should tell you everything you need to know about these vaccines.

Yes, they are apparently nominally effective, though there is conflicting information as to whether vaccinated people can still carry/transmit the virus. Yes, they may be effective for months or years - unknown at this time if or how often boosters will be required. Yes, they may be effective, or not, against variants of the virus - conflicting reports on this too. Gosh it's almost like we don't know much about these... They may be safe, or there may be long-term side effects that don't show up for months or years. We don't know because no-one has had them for years, only the tiniest fraction of people have had it for up to 1 year.

To me the idea of putting 100 million or more people into a brand new medication trial is insane and reckless to the point of negligence. Particularly in light of the apparent survival rates for most demographics that might catch the virus. I hope everything turns out ok, or at least reasonably ok - the vaccines work and don't cause too much pain and suffering. But it is also likely, given our history with trying new things, that there will be some horrible consequences too this rash action. I hope they are not too widespread.

[BDParrish]

Not any discernible pattern at all.
No place to even start.
I can see the site rash happening which is most of these reactions but that is not killing people.

[Jane Long]

Thanks, doc...for your valued input and important warnings, against these experimental mNRA agents.

Much appreciated, as always.

[bagster]

Not necessarily. If the person’s mental state, body functions, etc., were so impacted by the vaccination, to the extent that they could not appreciate the danger or risk of a falling brick in a construction zone, it should be reported. A nexus between the vaccination and the cause of the injury could be made.

Oh, FFS.

Bro.

[bagster]

You busted the paid, troll/vax influencers, bags!!

I can't take credit. Somebody slipped me a crib note. I just presented it in my own superlative Bagster style.

[Jane Long]

The one reaction that could be attributed to the vaccine was so minor that, for all intents and purposes, it wasn’t a reaction. I’m not going to say what it was because it’s none of your business but it was probably more closely related to anxiety.

O, rly?

Is that your *professional* opinion?

Just what, exactly, IS your profession?

You claim to have doled out hundreds of 'vaccine' shots, even saying you're a vaccine machine....at 'your' hospital.

And, you seem to think 'your' hospital had the very first China Flu patient.

Now, you're stating as fact what a possible fake-vaccine, REAL reaction might possibly be 'attributed' to.

So, go on....tell us, Mr/Ms Expert.....what EXACTLY is your medical background and area of medical expertise/specialty?

[bert]

blah blah blah fake vaccine yada yada yada

[bagster]

blah blah blah fake vaccine yada yada yada

No kidding.

Errbody knows its,

blah blah blah fake Chinese vaccine blah blah blah.

[Cathi]

“The way I understand the “autopsy” thing is that there ought to be a way to show how the vaccine kills.”

Actually not...there are very few autopsies done in these cases and the following is probably why.

“Dr. Erik Christensen, Utah’s chief Medical Examiner, said proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens. “Did the vaccine cause this? I think that would be very hard to demonstrate in autopsy,” he said.”

“Erik can think of only one instance where you would see a vaccine as the cause of death on an official autopsy report and that would be in an immediate case of Anaphylaxis. One where a person received the vaccine and died almost instantaneously. “Short of that” he said, “it would be difficult for us to definitively say this is the vaccine.” A more likely result, would be a lack of answers or an “incomplete autopsy.”

“The autopsy, he said, can provide answers to a family when no disease or red flags are found. As Erik explained, “that we don’t see a competing cause of death.” That lack of answers may help them understand if the vaccine was a possible cause.”

“He says that it would be very hard to determine in an autopsy that a vaccine contributed to the death.”

[bagster]

So, go on....tell us, Mr/Ms Expert.....what EXACTLY is your medical background and area of medical expertise/specialty?

I got him pictured as a medical assistant (MA), an LVN, or a 300 pound Gaylord Fokker male nurse. Or maybe even a janitor sweeping up the exam rooms.

But he's got friends that tell him stuff.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Hi Pfizer sales rep!

How’s the April sales quota looking so far?

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Third question…

3. do you want a mRNA treatment that makes your cells produce things that look like invaders to your immune system?

Would you like an autoimmune disease with your “vaccine?”