Replies

I’ll try to do what I can do:

First, consider that since the MSM was completely compromised, and now that we’re in the last days, weeks tops, of the cabal, the MSM is now openly the enemy. There is no point in even thinking they could corroborate anything. If one tries to see any confirming news, then one needs to re-consider what the Q-group is trying to accomplish in the first place.

I wondered your question exactly when I saw that news item. It was linked to on a Telegram channel I follow.

So, first off, that Telegram channel has shown much truth in its past postings. It is on the money with regards to Q and taking down the DS. Not corroboration, but at least something to nibble on the edges of corroboration.

Then, I went to the article, upsited to the main page of the website, and then flowed back down into other stories. Checked the about page. This looked on the up and up to me. YMMV, check it yourself.

Finally, consider what Q was trying to say in #34. The arrest is ONLY a marker. We’ve been told time and time again in the past that Podesta and Huma are both ‘bye-bye’. So, the only relevant info intended to be provided is the news of an arrest. It’s timing, it’s happening, is immaterial to the news content. That’s just filler. As a marker, it works. It fulfills the trigger for #34. #34 never says, ‘this news will appear in the NYT’.

Consider the points above all together... not the NYT, marker, trigger, #34, etc.