Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

At the local level hospitals are incentivized to ‘support’ the vaccine and due to this they may interfere with physician-patient relationships, where physician is employed by the hospital, when patient doesn’t want a vaccine.


1,983 posted on 04/06/2021 12:29:08 PM PDT by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1980 | View Replies ]


  • For breastfeeding moms, COVID-19 vaccinations may also protect babies

    4/6/2021, 12:30:15 PM · 6 of 6
    ransomnote to Red Badger

    There are known risks regarding mRNA vaccinations and it’s sickening the general public is not being informed. It’s monsterous to see pregnant women not being given informed consent (i.e., denying them access to critical information). The CDC et. al. are concealing risks from the public because more would refuse the vaccine and demand FDA approved drugs Ivermecting, HCQ etc.

    At the link in the NIH’s database of accepted research is a report saying that vaccine trial participants SHOULD HAVE been told about the increased risk of ADE, and all future patients SHOULD BE warned. On the CDC’s website, no mention of documented risk of ADE, even on the page for pregnant women.

    Excerpt: “Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

    Since discovery of mRNA technology in 2005, animal trials repeatedly demonstrated that the vaccinated animals develop antibodies as expected, but then when exposed to Covid, their immune systems overheat and they die. Usually, this effect does not start until the 3-6 month window. The vaccine trials were therefore 2-3 months in length.


1,984 posted on 04/06/2021 12:31:37 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1983 | View Replies ]

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

At the local level hospitals are incentivized to ‘support’ the vaccine and due to this they may interfere with physician-patient relationships, where physician is employed by the hospital, when patient doesn’t want a vaccine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes. It seems the CIA has coined the term ‘vaccine hesitancy’ for those ‘too ignorant’ to want the vaccine.


1,985 posted on 04/06/2021 12:33:20 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1983 | View Replies ]

.


1,986 posted on 04/06/2021 12:35:21 PM PDT by MomwithHope (Forever grateful to all our patriots, past, present and future. problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1983 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson