Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LittleLinda
That isn't a man. That's a walking vagina with feet.

In a natural world, natural selection woulda taken care of him and his ancestors long ago.

He better thank God for civilization every day of his pitiful life, just as every derp should.


1,345 posted on 04/04/2021 9:37:31 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1336 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
A scene from beyond the trees:

Beyond the trees person:

I’m not getting vax. Considering J&J, but not available here. I really don’t want any of them but my son is bullying me. (Would it be unmotherly to call him a jerk?)

Bagster the Magnificent:

(in an underground cave in the future)

Mutant #1: "Bro, why did YOU take the vax?".

Mutant #2: "My son bullied me".

Mutant #1: "Bro".

The end.


1,346 posted on 04/04/2021 9:43:12 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

That isn’t a man. That’s a walking vagina with feet.
_______________________________________________________

Yes. I felt pity for him since he’s probably one of the 4-5% Q said would be lost forever to the left’s narratives.


1,374 posted on 04/04/2021 10:39:48 PM PDT by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies ]

The Supreme Court has ruled on a case on Monday related to former President Donald Trump’s use of his Twitter account. Specifically, the case dealt with whether or not he was allowed to block users who were repeatedly criticizing him.

Twitter users filed the case Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump in 2017 and argued that the former president had violated their First Amendment rights by blocking their user accounts. While Trump tweeted from his personal account, the Twitter users argued that he had used it in a presidential capacity by releasing official statements, thus making it a “public forum.” In 2018, a judge in New York ruled that the president’s actions were unconstitutional.

SCOTUS sent the case back to a federal appeals court and dismissed it as moot. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion stating that dismissing the case was the right thing to do, noting that Donald Trump is no longer in office.

https://protrumpnews.com/supreme-court-dismisses-case-against-trump/


1,479 posted on 04/05/2021 7:57:14 AM PDT by Melian (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens. ~ Gimli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson