Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Number of women to lose their unborn child after having the Covid Vaccine increases by 366% in just six weeks
dailyexpose.co.uk ^ | 3/21/2021 | The Daily Expose

Posted on 03/30/2021 8:27:40 AM PDT by ransomnote

Thank you to Fractal Trader for finding the article I review below while researching the content in the following thread.

[UK] Number of Pregnant Women suffering Miscarriage after having Covid Vaccine increases by 483% in just 7 weeks

3/29/2021, 12:45:33 PM · by Fractal Trader · 
Daily Exposer ^ | 28 March 2021

I'm going to post some information from the article Fractal Trader found first, and decided not to post, while tracing the path back to the UK.GOV article linked above.

I am not familiar with the the UK website, The Daily Expose, and 'expose' in the title of the blog doesn't ensure validity, but we report data from official sources, too).

The article content I'm sharing did link to the reliable UK.gov report in Fractal's thread, and references data in the UK version of standard CDC VAERS type software.

It's important to know that since the 'vaccines' are just being introduced these past few months, the overall numbers of lost pregnancies are very low, but they are so much higher than normal (percentage increase), it's likely to increase rapidly as more receive it. Often in animal trials negative effects start showing up 3 - 6 months after Covid 'vaccination'.

I'll post some CDC snippets below and summarize a few of the article comments where relevant.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Number of women to lose their unborn child after having the Covid Vaccine increases by 366% in just six weeks – The Daily Expose

 BY  ON MARCH 21, 2021  

The authors of The Daily Expose article wondered why pregnanant women were receiving the Covid 'shots' in the first place.

I'll reword the author's text around the charts so I don't have to keep quoting.

Based on the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme data as of January 24, 2021, a total of 4 women had suffered a miscarriage as a result of having the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.


As well as a total of 2 women losing their unborn child as result of having the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.

 

Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 475% increase  in the number of women who have lost their unborn child after having the Pfizer vaccine, bringing the total to 23. This is devastating.

Sadly there's 1 report of a premature baby dying after the mother had the Pfizer vaccine. This could have happened as a result of other factors, but we need to watch and take note to try to head off any needless loss of life.

I understand that MHRA Yellow Card Scheme contains observed data (date of the event, description of adverse reaction) and not causal data (which relies on years of biomedical analysis to determine if other factors were entirely or partly responsible for the event), but we must make use of what we observe because it's all we have right now, and it would reckless to wait for extensive research to be completely.

The UK.gov and the  CDC and Co. are steering us onto the rocks. Both the US and UK system reflects adverse events like lose pregnancies, which are not receiving adequate attention.

The AstraZeneca 'shot' is also reported to have observations of lost pregnancy events. Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 150% increase  in the number of women to suffer a miscarriage, bringing the total to 5.

Unfortunately, 1 still birth was reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme after the mother had the AstraZeneca vaccine, but for some reason this has not been labelled as a fatality

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Daily Expose decided to investigate how lost pregnancies were occurring in relation to Covid-19 'vaccinations' given UK.gov's advice to pregnant women. 

Here's an excerpt: 

"Well we started digging and found that the Government has since updated it’s original advice to the following –

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential
benefits
 outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ah, the old risk vs. benefits excuse to recommend the fake vaccines. This is particularly egregious since we're all being bathed in purported 'benefits' and starved of objective information about 'risks'.

I've seen lost pregnancies listed in the US version (VAERS) of the UK's tracking softare. Below is a screen capture of the CDC's advice (3/29/2021) to pregnant women in the United States.

Note the CDC defers to a pregnant woman's 'personal choice' whether or not to get the 'vaccine'. Isn't that favoritism in the work place requiring employees to get the 'vaccine'. ( I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO GET THE VACCINE. My comment about favoritism is a play on the Woke-ism driving people from employment)

Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding | CDC

All those pushing this 'vaccine' on an uninformed public use the absence of sufficient data to prove it's a good product and to deny it's a bad product. 'Limited' current data on a technology with 16 years of failure (dead animal trials etc.) becomes the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, or the CDC/UK.GOV seal of approval.

We have to advocate for ourselves. Demand the truth and ask the unpleasant questions of doctors and public health officials (local to federal).

The following image was taken from FReeper defconw's link to a large .jpg collection of social media posts detailing negative experiences. I dont' recall if there was more than one from a pregnant woman, and again, these are just observations, not the results of 10 years of medical study.

The following post includes defconw's montage of all the social media reports combined in one image file (.jpg). Below her link, I broke the images up into smaller pieces which can be read in a single column.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3942345/posts?page=1999#1999 (freerepublic.com)


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antivax; chinavirusvaccine; miscarriage; pregnantwomen; qtards; sideeffects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: glorgau
"Why would someone get a vaccination while pregnant?"

Same question I have. It makes no sense to introduce an unknown substance into your body while you are carrying a child.

41 posted on 03/30/2021 11:07:33 AM PDT by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Got you a theme song suitable for a government drug pusher.

Enjoy.

GutDamn The Pusher Man

Keep messin' around, Harkonnen, and I'll get Ransomnote on ya again.

You know she don't play.


42 posted on 03/30/2021 11:29:57 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“Could someone do something about this flood of rabid, festering pile of anti-vaccine feces? It’s getting very tiresome as well as boring. Only the brain dead buy this crap.

Away with you, government vaxxer boy.

Go shoot up your Chinese potion and leave real people alone.”

You have your head so far up your ass that you have to have air piped in.


43 posted on 03/30/2021 11:35:09 AM PDT by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bayan
You have your head so far up your ass that you have to have air piped in.

Canned response. Seems outdated. Can't dance to it.

I give it a 2.6

Now go pimp your government drugs somewhere else....and get your shine box.


44 posted on 03/30/2021 11:48:15 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bayan; House Atreides; ransomnote
Ya know how back in the day, when 'anti-vaxxer' was a curse word and they were considered worse than literally Hitler?

Well, part of this current vaxxer vs. anti-vaxxer war is due to the purposeful stigmatization program that was used to accomplish that.

As usual, deep state psyops bleed over into otherwise independent free American 'conservatives' and they catch the indoctrination.

This current controversy is a whole nother kettle of fish than that previous period. Along with this one comes a bio attack by a foreign enemy coordinated with a domestic attack from within.

Following up the attack, which resulted in the overtaking of our government, comes a follow-up 'vaccine' program which is, according to the science, sketchy at best and dangerous at worst.

What kind of fool wouldn't see the potential for disaster here. Why would otherwise smart, patriotic Americans, wary of government in the best of times, trust this vaccine now, in the worst of times?

Yet here we have so-called conservatives pushing it VEHEMENTLY, while others shuffle off to the clinics for their government jab.

I'm tellin' ya. They could make a movie about this right here.

They could call it, 'The March of the Stupids'.

I have spoken.


45 posted on 03/30/2021 12:01:43 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“...What kind of fool wouldn’t see the potential for disaster here. Why would otherwise smart, patriotic Americans, wary of government in the best of times, trust this vaccine now, in the worst of times?...”
***************************************************************
Probably because they’re not swallowing the lies being told by the deranged anti-vaxxers and they’re seeing the effectiveness and the safety of the vaccines. 96 million Americans have received at least one dose and that includes over 73% of our 65 or older population.

Trump’s warp speed vaccines, along with Republican leaders refusing to keep closures going, are helping us achieve herd immunity


46 posted on 03/30/2021 12:15:56 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Bro, all your posts look the same. You don't update them when you receive new, refutable information. You still are saying nobodys died from the vax when you've seen the tons of evidence that they have.

You ignore facts and repeat your lies.

You are a dirty and despicable liar and shill for a dirty and despicable government and deep state.

Take a bath and repent.

p.s. Or maybe you're a bot. Your posts are generic and repetitive and full of state propaganda.

But other than all that, you seem nice.


47 posted on 03/30/2021 12:26:12 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“Report an Adverse Event to VAERS

VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences. Anyone can submit a report to VAERS, including parents and patients....

...Online reporting is strongly encouraged. Please report clinically important adverse events that occur after vaccination of adults and children, even if you are not sure whether the vaccine caused the adverse event....”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html

....................................................................
Two weeks after getting my 2nd Moderna shot, I came down with about a half hour fit of sneezing. My wife tried to convince me that it happened because I was down in the cellar cleaning, stirring up and breathing in lots of accumulated dust.

Since my final dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was taken a mere two weeks before the sneezing fit I blamed that vaccination and not the dust.

I responsibly reported it to VAERS as an adverse reaction to the vaccine. Because I reported the sneezing to VAERS there’s now “evidence” that the vaccine causes sneezing. Kinda like if you see something on the internet, it must be true.


48 posted on 03/30/2021 12:34:00 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RC one
except for the 550,000 Americans that didn't survive it.

Yeah, funny thing about that number. The overall US death rate in 2020 stayed about the same as 2019. COVID deaths way up, other deaths like heart disease , etc. way down. Average age of death in US...78 years...average age of COVID death 78 years. Mmm, why is that? Easy, incentivize COVID deaths with $ ... you get more COVID.

49 posted on 03/30/2021 12:34:36 PM PDT by suijuris (Once a man learns to see he finds himself alone in the world with nothing but folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
That post looks familiar, bot.

Is it rerun season already?


50 posted on 03/30/2021 12:39:41 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bagster

” They could call it, ‘The March of the Stupids’.

I have spoken.”

And magnificently demonstrated just how stupid you are. Leading the March must be such a turn on for you.


51 posted on 03/30/2021 1:01:48 PM PDT by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NCRN
Because the woman works in healthcare and it’s required by their employer.

Time to choose a different line of employment or take a leave of absence until the birth. Tough choice, but life is full of tough choices.

52 posted on 03/30/2021 1:18:55 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: suijuris

53 posted on 03/30/2021 4:29:55 PM PDT by RC one (When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RC one

The numbers are all BULL SCAT. It comes from the fear purveyors in our fake government.

Any truth from Washington is promptly buried in the manure they usually put out.


54 posted on 03/30/2021 5:02:05 PM PDT by JayAr36 (My disgust with government is complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson