Skip to comments.
Number of women to lose their unborn child after having the Covid Vaccine increases by 366% in just six weeks
dailyexpose.co.uk ^
| 3/21/2021
| The Daily Expose
Posted on 03/30/2021 8:27:40 AM PDT by ransomnote
Thank you to Fractal Trader for finding the article I review below while researching the content in the following thread.
I'm going to post some information from the article Fractal Trader found first, and decided not to post, while tracing the path back to the UK.GOV article linked above.
I am not familiar with the the UK website, The Daily Expose, and 'expose' in the title of the blog doesn't ensure validity, but we report data from official sources, too).
The article content I'm sharing did link to the reliable UK.gov report in Fractal's thread, and references data in the UK version of standard CDC VAERS type software.
It's important to know that since the 'vaccines' are just being introduced these past few months, the overall numbers of lost pregnancies are very low, but they are so much higher than normal (percentage increase), it's likely to increase rapidly as more receive it. Often in animal trials negative effects start showing up 3 - 6 months after Covid 'vaccination'.
I'll post some CDC snippets below and summarize a few of the article comments where relevant.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Number of women to lose their unborn child after having the Covid Vaccine increases by 366% in just six weeks – The Daily Expose
BY THE DAILY EXPOSE ON MARCH 21, 2021
The authors of The Daily Expose article wondered why pregnanant women were receiving the Covid 'shots' in the first place.
I'll reword the author's text around the charts so I don't have to keep quoting.
Based on the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme data as of January 24, 2021, a total of 4 women had suffered a miscarriage as a result of having the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
As well as a total of 2 women losing their unborn child as result of having the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.
Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 475% increase in the number of women who have lost their unborn child after having the Pfizer vaccine, bringing the total to 23. This is devastating.
Sadly there's 1 report of a premature baby dying after the mother had the Pfizer vaccine. This could have happened as a result of other factors, but we need to watch and take note to try to head off any needless loss of life.
I understand that MHRA Yellow Card Scheme contains observed data (date of the event, description of adverse reaction) and not causal data (which relies on years of biomedical analysis to determine if other factors were entirely or partly responsible for the event), but we must make use of what we observe because it's all we have right now, and it would reckless to wait for extensive research to be completely.
The UK.gov and the CDC and Co. are steering us onto the rocks. Both the US and UK system reflects adverse events like lose pregnancies, which are not receiving adequate attention.
The AstraZeneca 'shot' is also reported to have observations of lost pregnancy events. Between January 24, 2021 and March 7th, there has been a 150% increase in the number of women to suffer a miscarriage, bringing the total to 5.
Unfortunately, 1 still birth was reported to the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme after the mother had the AstraZeneca vaccine, but for some reason this has not been labelled as a fatality
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Daily Expose decided to investigate how lost pregnancies were occurring in relation to Covid-19 'vaccinations' given UK.gov's advice to pregnant women.
Here's an excerpt:
"Well we started digging and found that the Government has since updated it’s original advice to the following –
4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
There is limited experience with use of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnant women.
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy,
embryo/foetal development, parturition or post-natal development. Administration of
the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential
benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah, the old risk vs. benefits excuse to recommend the fake vaccines. This is particularly egregious since we're all being bathed in purported 'benefits' and starved of objective information about 'risks'.
I've seen lost pregnancies listed in the US version (VAERS) of the UK's tracking softare. Below is a screen capture of the CDC's advice (3/29/2021) to pregnant women in the United States.
Note the CDC defers to a pregnant woman's 'personal choice' whether or not to get the 'vaccine'. Isn't that favoritism in the work place requiring employees to get the 'vaccine'. ( I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO GET THE VACCINE. My comment about favoritism is a play on the Woke-ism driving people from employment)
Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding | CDC
All those pushing this 'vaccine' on an uninformed public use the absence of sufficient data to prove it's a good product and to deny it's a bad product. 'Limited' current data on a technology with 16 years of failure (dead animal trials etc.) becomes the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, or the CDC/UK.GOV seal of approval.
We have to advocate for ourselves. Demand the truth and ask the unpleasant questions of doctors and public health officials (local to federal).
The following image was taken from FReeper defconw's link to a large .jpg collection of social media posts detailing negative experiences. I dont' recall if there was more than one from a pregnant woman, and again, these are just observations, not the results of 10 years of medical study.
The following post includes defconw's montage of all the social media reports combined in one image file (.jpg). Below her link, I broke the images up into smaller pieces which can be read in a single column.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3942345/posts?page=1999#1999 (freerepublic.com)
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: antivax; chinavirusvaccine; miscarriage; pregnantwomen; qtards; sideeffects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: shanover
BINGO BINGO !!!! We have a Winner
Both camps, The Cult of the Vaxxers and the Anti-Vaxxers have dug in their heels. It is quite amusing and many times very frustrating.
So, to the people who gleefully jumped on the the Cult of the Vaxxers, congratulations, best wishes, good luck with your decision. Hope that there are no adverse effects.
To the Anti-Vaxxers, congratulations, best wishes, good luck with your decision. Hope there are no adverse effects.
In my opinion and with 30+ years of Risk Management experience, when it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, NO AMMOUNT of coercion in my opinion will turn that duck into a moose. The Full Court Press to “Sell” this vaccine just smells funny. I’m waiting, thank you very much.
21
posted on
03/30/2021 9:09:24 AM PDT
by
OHPatriot
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: DuncanWaring
a disease that, for most, is highly-survivable.except for the 550,000 Americans that didn't survive it.
22
posted on
03/30/2021 9:13:34 AM PDT
by
RC one
(When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
To: ransomnote; All
23
posted on
03/30/2021 9:13:39 AM PDT
by
PGalt
(past peak civilization?)
To: ransomnote
Aren’t women who are pregnant warned against the risk of these so-called vaccines (which seem more like weaponizable delivery systems)?
I’m a dude and even I’ve heard about these warnings!
24
posted on
03/30/2021 9:14:09 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: ransomnote
It is astonishing how blatantly Evil and deceitful this Kyle stupid pandemic has been under the “care” of the higher upside. This is by all rights a crime against humanity when they know so eating like the vaccine Wil. Cause problems with certain fo.ks, yet not a.ert them to the possibility.
If this was happening undDer Trump the left would be accusing him of a crime.
25
posted on
03/30/2021 9:24:12 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: ransomnote
I also wonder about peol.e with preexisting Co dictionary who get the vaccine. Wil. It create problems down the road for them? Worsen their conditions?
26
posted on
03/30/2021 9:26:05 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: ransomnote
27
posted on
03/30/2021 9:27:49 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
To: RC one
That’s assuming they actually had it.
The PCR test had a 90% false-positive rate.
Many of those who died were nursing-home residents who would not have died if their evil/incompetent governors hadn’t jammed infected patients back into their homes.
Many of those who actually died of “the COVID!” would have died within a couple of months of old age anyway.
The furiously-fanned Flames of Fear have been highly effective on you, for sure.
28
posted on
03/30/2021 9:30:20 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: ransomnote
The number of women miscarrying will increase over time regardless. By the end of March, 3 times as many women will have miscarried as by the end of January, because you are measuring a three month interval instead of one month.
If the miscarriage rate increased by 3 or 4 times, they great majority of women would miscarry, because the baseline rate is already 20%.
That has not happened.
29
posted on
03/30/2021 9:30:37 AM PDT
by
heartwood
(Someone has to play devil's advocate other.)
To: glorgau
That was my first thought. Good God. Even if you had co-morbidities...
30
posted on
03/30/2021 9:33:34 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
("I’d rather enjoy a risky freedom than a safe servitude." Robby Dinero, USMC Veteran, Gym Owner)
To: dforest
This guy didn’t lose a baby, but look.
https://www.mystateline.com/news/virginia-man-suffers-rare-severe-reaction-to-covid-19-vaccine/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As bad as that rash looks, I've seen so much worse - some videos where the body is spasming all over, or persons in a coma etc.
After reading through reports of side-effects/deaths below, I wonder just how many Covid vaccination deaths are being declared caused by other illnesses, like heart attacks, strokes, and.....Covid?
If you develop Covid symptoms within days of your first vaccine (a result of th evaccine feared by some researchers and doctors) or before your 2nd vaccine is declared effective (2 weeks) then die of it, they WILL no doubt call it a Covid-19 death. They'll tell the family etc. it was Covid-19. They can use deaths from the vaccine to falsely increase the number of deaths from Covid-19 instead.
The PCR test and anti-body tests do not accurately reveal the presence of Covid-19 illness, so those suffering side effects of the vaccine within 60 days of a possitive Covid test or less than 2 weeks after your second does, those deaths are unlikely to be attributed to the vaccine but will be added to the fake planned-demic death count.
31
posted on
03/30/2021 9:33:52 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: Red Badger
All part of ‘The Plan’..........................
Which is NEVER LET A CRISIS GO TO WASTE!
32
posted on
03/30/2021 9:41:22 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(leave the gun, take the canolis)
To: Bayan
Could someone do something about this flood of rabid, festering pile of anti-vaccine feces? It’s getting very tiresome as well as boring. Only the brain dead buy this crap. Away with you, government vaxxer boy.
Go shoot up your Chinese potion and leave real people alone.
33
posted on
03/30/2021 9:53:56 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: ransomnote
Yep ,it’s Bill gates population control in 2 shots and if it doesn’t work they’ll say oh you need more shots
To: ransomnote
I would take all of this as the voice of God telling us ... “ My children don’t need it “
35
posted on
03/30/2021 10:10:20 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true !)
To: DuncanWaring
The PCR test had a 90% false-positive rate.That's probably the craziest statement I've heard around here this month. Congratulations.
36
posted on
03/30/2021 10:15:15 AM PDT
by
RC one
(When a bunch of commies start telling you that you don't need an AR15, you really need an AR15)
To: RC one
Crazy?
Even the NY Times admitted it, contrary to their orangemanbad agenda.
37
posted on
03/30/2021 10:16:38 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: ransomnote
Not this silliness yet again. Alleging that receiving a COVID-19 vaccination “may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)” if the vaccinated person later is exposed to the actual COVID-19 virus is akin to saying going for a walk may result in being abducted by space aliens.
Over 95 million Americans (over 28% of the American population) have received at least the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Every day more than 50,000 Americans newly test positive for COVID-19 and certainly more than that were newly exposed and were not tested for various reasons. Common sense tells you that many new COVID-19 virus exposures are among the 95 million vaccinated Americans. And yet NOT ONE ADE CASE HAS BEEN REPORTED.
To: glorgau
Because the woman works in healthcare and it’s required by their employer. My daughter is an RN. She works with the geriatric population and was required to get the vaccine. She found out she was pregnant right before time to get the second shot. Her OB told her the shot was safe. She got it. Went to same OB yesterday for an ultrasound. Dead baby.
39
posted on
03/30/2021 10:33:25 AM PDT
by
NCRN
To: House Atreides
40
posted on
03/30/2021 10:39:38 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson