Strange, I’ve always found people of sub intelligence tend to use emojis on every single post
‘
don’t feel bad, it’s psychology - another form of science
There are less than 100 documented cases of reinfection in the entire world at this moment in time. So it’s a bit early to make any calls. But from that little group are reinfection by a different variant at the same or different time, and asymptomatics being reinfected. Adjusted for age, no increase in mortality although asymptomatics did tend to become symptomatic - with no vaccine involved.
The only wild card, then and now, is each person’s one-of, unique immune system. Is the individual response to either the virus or the vaccine weak or strong? With the elderly still most at risk since they have age-handicapped immune systems.
So far, nobody’s growing horns or tails or dropping dead on the street. That includes the trial subjects, now coming up on 8 months immunity who have had multiple opportunities for reexposure. IF we get to the point where enough people are vaccinated and have a degree of immunity, the virus will burn out. Which is the goal. So any concerns about hyped up, specific antibodies at the expense of other antibodies, will be mute. And that’s a good thing.
But if population control is the objective then party like you’re in Rio and that’ll do it.
https://directorsblog.nih.gov/tag/covid-19-reinfection/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-covid-19-reinfection-means-for-vaccines/
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210323/COVID-19-antibodies-protect-against-reinfection-for-at-least-eight-months.aspx
According to many scientific journals, the findings of sub-standard intellects are most often flawed.
This is based not only on science and psychology, but math as well.
So it’s a bit early to make any calls.
If so, why vaccines?
I think somebody made a call. You should call their office and tell them your theory.
