Unfortunately, as bad as those numbers are they are only a fraction of the reported, but not yet published data. VAERS is two months behind in publishing reports.
Author has updated the very interesting animated chart on published VAERS I had posted yesterday. Each week VAERS publishes new reports and also back-fills previous weeks’ unpublished reports. In late February they were reporting on early January covid vax VAERS at 200-400 a day. In each of the following 4 weeks they have revised those numbers upward and they are now up to 3,000 a day for the early January VAERS.
https://twitter.com/birb_k/with_replies
“VAERS BACK-PUBLISHING UPDATE (26 MAR). Adverse Event backfill curve actually steeper than before. At a rate of publishing 5-7 thousand/week, seems impossible to get proper visibility into important data under EUA to support informed consent while “vaccinations” are fast track.”
“VAERS UNDER-PUBLISHING. Another attempt to visualize massive scale of unpublished adverse events. The way they are filling in old reports as catch-up seems like shoveling snow with a spoon. Rate of new reports rapidly outpacing catch-up. We can’t learn from what we can’t see.”
______________________________________________
Looks like we are a long way from getting the full info on the adverse effects/deaths from the covid vaccine.
Alex Berenson:
More evidence of a massive backlog in making #Covid vaccine side effect reports public - each VAERS report gets a unique ID, numbered roughly sequentially. Thus in 30+ years pre-Covid (to Dec. 2020) VAERS had received 770,000 reports, and it was at roughly VAERS ID #902,000...
In fact, the IDs were only six digits long, allowing for a maximum of 1 million reports. Which should have lasted at least late 2022 - in recent years, the system has averaged ~3,500 reports a month, mostly non-serious (from 2018-2020, it averaged 13 death reports a month)...
Then the mRNA vaccines showed up. With a few weeks the odometer rolled and the system needed seven digits. Now the IDs are past 1,115,348 (a death report received March 19) - implying ~180,000 reports received from early December (assuming the ID sequencing has not changed)...
Further, the reports have become much more serious; for the first 19 days of March the system published ~50 reports of death or life-threatening injury EACH DAY (those are published - again, it is not yet clear how many were received)...
And @cdcgov and @generaldynamics, which manages VAERS, are now trying to gear up to handle the flood of reports. On March 8, CDC gave GD a budget supplement of $16 million; GD is now hiring more “service representatives” to take reports and medical coders to review them...
The good news is this puts the lie to the Vaccine Church’s “THE VAERS REP0RtS ARE full of LIES - and the proof is 15 years ago someone filed a fake one” nonsense. @CDCgov and GD do seem to be making a good-faith effort to build capacity and manage the database...
The bad news is that if the sequencing is even close to accurate, we are WAY behind in knowing what the side effects profile of the mRNAs really looks like. And how can a system that normally is tasked with looking at three death reports a week gear up to examine 50 or 100 times that many?
VAERS needs to be overloaded with reports, fake or otherwise, until the persons responsible MUST take action to account for such numbers.