Replies

Snatched each and every one of those amazing assertions from your very own friendly local Qtard "research" threads. Because that's some serious world-savin' business right there, yep.

Friendly? I thought we were just the meanest, rudest pack of hyenas to ever grace the tundra.

Make up your mind. I was gonna answer your ridiculous post line by line, I had it halfway done, then I thought. What a target that would be for your people, troll village, the Nation of Negative Karma.

Nope. Not gonna fall for your trap. You just go on believing that's what THE QTARDS BELIEVE.

What if I took all the things you've ever said, jokes and all, and told people THAT'S WHAT HUMBLEGUNNER BELIEVES?

That would be a dirty trick, right? And a damnable lie?

Why yes, yes it would. And that's what you do. You're lucky I like you, bumpkin. I let your dirt slide off my back, but I wonder why you like to let everybody else think what you're saying is true.

I had a point by point answer to your massive pack of lies done, then deleted it. I said to myself, why should I play in the basement with the troll when I can keep the high ground.

Just understand that you are being dirty with that post. You know damn well THE Q TARDS don't believe JFKjr is alive and well over half of the sh*t you wrote. But you put it out for everybody to see. You and I both know there are a LOT of dumb people here. This Lurker guy (and his ruck sack), for example .

If he's not smart enough to believe Q is real, then he's not smart enough to think through your post and understand that normal people wouldn't believe those things you listed, even if Q said them (which he didn't in about 80% of that trash).

Here's an assignment. Take each and every point you wrote and do your own thinking. Ask yourself, could that be possible? If it were true, what would we see in the real world. What would be the repercussions. What do I know that can be used to verify or debunk. Then assign a percentage in your mind about the likelihood that it's true.

Add up all the clues in the clues closet, and apply your limited brain and VOILA. You have an opinion.

That is the process you are lacking. That's why you see a discussion during which somebody says JFKjr is alive and pluck it out and say QTARDS BELIEVE JFKjr IS ALIVE.

You fail to take into consideration the contextual discussion and contrary opinion.

See what I mean by dirty?

In parting, I got an Aesop's fable for ya.

"I saw, this one time, people on FR talking about aliens being demons from beelzebub and they lived in human form and walked among us".

"FReeRepublic believes aliens walk among us. How do you respond to that Humblegunner"?

Do you understand what I'm saying?

Or are you gonna go on acting like I never just told you that fable. Back to step one. You can decide to be dirty, or...

Anyway, liked the thing, you know...the thing.

#HappinessIsAWarmGun

Snatched each and every one of those amazing assertions...

By jove, I think I've got it!

*lightbulb*

Are you lying when you use the word 'assertions', or do you truly believe its true?

Or maybe you don't understand what the word means. It means to put forward as fact.

There are other, more accurate words you could have used. 'theory', 'postulation', 'conjecture', 'spitbaling', etc.

Very, very rarely will you see someone 'assert' a thing as if it were proven. It takes a lot.

So I don't think you properly understand or 'hear' the Q conversation. And that's not even taking into account the 'shorthand' people use when writing or speaking.

Example: When I use the word or letter Q in a sentence, I don't really mean one guy. I mean the whole thing, sometimes up to and including Trump, and sometimes not. When I say 'you' I sometimes mean 'you people', and vice versa. It I had to describe the Q op every time I mentioned Q, I'd be here till the bars closed.

Also, cherry picking hurts the back in the long haul. My mexican gardener told me so.