[lepton]

But your argument reduces to the claim that an erroneous number is better than no number.

---

My argument reduces to the understanding that there are error margins, and that the bounds of those error margins exclude his conclusion. A bounded uncertainty is better than no number.

[reasonisfaith]

“A bounded uncertainty is better than no number.”

HORSEHONKEY!!!

When the error margins have been set in such a way that they perpetrate fraud, then the bounded uncertainty is equivalent to nothing!

Think of it this way: Sincere inaccuracy = one, but fraud = zero.