Replies

So maybe there wasn’t a 4 year plan to retake America. Maybe it was a 5 or 8 year plan. Either way, let’s be honest. Q overpromised, whether deliberately or not. Q is no LARP. There is too much truth in the Q posts to dismiss Q as a LARP. But Q may have overpromised. Let’s face it, if patriots were really in as much control as Q assured us they were, there would have been no need to allow Biden to steal the presidency. We wouldn’t be seeing illegals flooding the border and we wouldn’t be seeing the false flags ramping up.

I am still hopeful that white hats are working behind the scenes to move the plan forward, but to believe that they let Biden assume the presidency in order to wake up the public, is an absurdity. As long as the black hats own the MSM and as long as cabal criminals are allowed to roam free, those who are asleep, and there are still many, will continue to blame any misfortune that befalls us on Trump and the MAGA movement, not on the true perpetrators.

So at the very least, Q overpromised, whether deliberately or not. If it was deliberate, then maybe it was because if Q had told us up front that the plan involved letting the cabal steal the presidency, even temporarily, most patriots would have turned their back on Q. If it was not deliberate, then maybe something reared its head last minute which prevented the white hats from stopping the steal, and patriots are now in the process of regrouping. We’ve been told by Q, and have been telling each other that disinformation is necessary. Maybe the idea that patriots are in complete control, and “nothing can stop what is coming” was itself disinformation.

As Reagan once said, trust but verify. I trust that Q is not a LARP. But some of Q’s assurances have failed their verification.

” Either way, let’s be honest. Q overpromised, whether deliberately or not. “

We won WW I in 4 years. We won WW II in 4 years. Both times, we had pretty much 100% of the country involved.

Now we’re in a war that has been going on for 100’s, some say 1,000s of years. And we expected it to be won in 4 years, with 20% (max) of the country involved?

80%/20% became 60%/40%. 60% is still a whole lot of things happening that will never see the light of day. Some of the 40% has been exposed, but not resolved. Without Q, even that wouldn’t have happened.

1, 2 and 3-year deltas, could turn into x-year deltas.

Did Q over-promise, or do we just not understand it all, yet? We’re not in charge of the timeline - we just think we are or that we know what it is.

I come at this from a different angle.

A few months ago I responded to an Anon posting that said the military had refused Plan Z, a hard military coup. I caught some flack for my analysis.

I turned to Carl von Clausewitz, who coined the term “fog of war” and said that no battle plan survives first contact with the enemy. I said that the original Plan Q had failed.

We assumed that the people behind Trump were playing 4-D or 5-D chess while the Deep State was caught flatfooted. We didn’t consider that the Deep Sate might also be playing 4-D or 5-D chess and fighting Team Q to a draw. That is what I thought had happened. My suspicion was that Team Q’s silence was to avoid giving away the details of Plan Q-v2.

Some things have become obvious in the past few months.

The bureaucratic technique of “putting a raincoat” on someone adverse to one’s position has been deployed on both Biden and Harris. Biden’s dementia has gone so far that the Mainstream Media is having trouble keeping up appearances. The old man signs whatever piece of paper is put in front of him. Harris’ complaint that she was out of the loop during the Middle East military action makes it clear that she is also wearing a raincoat. Others are making the critical decisions, and I suspect that a lot of those decision makers are not in government.

There is also a technique known as “bureaucratic friction.” As orders are passed down through a bureaucracy, the lower levels balk at following through on orders with which they disagree. The military doesn’t experience that much bureaucratic friction because there is always followup on orders. Harry Truman summed it up perfectly in his typically pithy and profane way when he said after the 1952 election, “Ike is used to the military where orders are followed. But when he sits behind this desk and gives an order, not one goddam thing is going to happen.” People on Team Q are doing their best to sandbag orders from above.

So what did Team Q do in response to the reluctance of the military to execute Plan Z? They opted for Plan Y, a soft military coup, as Plan Q-v2.

This is where I turn to Thomas Wictor, whom I suspect has his finger on what is going on behind the scenes.

The military appears to be following Biden for surface appearances, but for substantive action the military appears to be following orders from a shadow government directed by Team Q. The military is preparing for urban guerilla warfare based on a finding drawn up by the NSC at the request of Lyndon Johnson in 1968. These plans are always kept up to date, and I suspect the Armed Forces are getting ready to implement them at the right time.

Wictor has noticed unusual military action that I suspect is an attempt to make sure there is no outside interference from the UN or China when Plan Y shifts to Plan Z.

According to the Anon posting, why did the military object to Plan Z? The military believed:

It would lead to civil war;
It would lead to the end of America’s role as a superpower and end the current tenuous peace if we were forced to withdraw troops from the rest of the world and bring them home to restore domestic tranquility;
It would lead to the end of America.

That response made sense. You have to reach the precipice, as Q put it, before people will accept military intervention to set things aright and purge the evil elements from American society. We aren’t there yet. Plan Y is still in force, however.

Wictor’s idea of devolution also makes sense. Some states, such as Florida, are already asserting their rightful powers, something Madison predicted in Federalist #46. Citizens are withdrawing the consent of the governed.

So what constitutes the precipice?

We are currently governed by an occupation government.
We’ve sustained a biological attack without taking retaliatory action on the attacker. In fact, the federal government is in league with the attacker.
We are being invaded from the south, and the federal government is in league with the invaders.

The only thing I can visualize today as the precipice is a military attack on the country, perhaps nuclear in nature.

There is a lot going on behind the scenes that is not apparent. I'm getting antsy, like so many others, but I haven't given up hope.