Replies

Lots of “nice” comments you get from those sowing doubt in the science and promoting the China talking points. Keep posting the truth.

What a trip. I read your comment and thought you were talking to Ransomnote, the author of this thread. Then I looked up and you were talking to Atreides (Harkonnen). I had a 'wtf' moment.

So, there is a study by Harvard and MIT, Atreides trashes it with his mouth (not an ounce of justification) and everybody else is 'anti science'?

Helpful hint, opposite boy. The 'Chinese talking points' are the ones that say, 'take the vaccine, gweilo. What could go wrong'.

And Atreides wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit him. Nor would you, it seems.

I swear, some of you clowns must live in Bizarro world.

Quite the disrespectful comment from you too. I wouldn’t call you a clown. However I might say you’re living in Bazarro World if you think it is nice to call someone on these boards a clown. Save that for the Leftnicks their fellow travelers like Biden.

What should be the value in our posts about such scientific studies is our understanding of what it said. This study by Harvard and MIT is on a theoretical level that I found hard to follow. What it failed to suggest is the vaccines being used to fight the C-virus will not be threatened if the theory is proven true. I received further assurance from the article with this:

“Dr Baltimore told media, “Because it is all pieces of the coronaviral genome, it can’t lead to infectious RNA or DNA and therefore it is probably biologically a dead end. It is also not clear if, in people, the cells that harbor the reverse transcripts stay around for a long time or they die. The work raises a lot of interesting questions.”

Let’s wait until the research is concluded before jumping to false, Bazarro World, conclusions.