Skip to comments.
Is Meghan Markle already preparing a bid to be America's first woman President? Duchess of Sussex will 'use furore over Oprah interview to launch political career as she networks among Democrats' [tr]
UK Daily Mail ^
| March 13, 2021
| Glen Owen
Posted on 03/16/2021 7:14:33 AM PDT by C19fan
Meghan Markle will use the furore over her interview with Oprah to launch a political career which could take her all the way to the White House, if rumours circulating around Westminster last week turn out to be accurate.
One senior Labour figure – a veteran of Tony Blair's Downing Street administration with strong links to Washington – claimed to The Mail on Sunday that Ms Markle, 39, was networking among senior Democrats with a view to building a campaign and fundraising teams for a tilt at the US Presidency.
Last night, a source close to the Duchess of Sussex declined to comment, but the couple have made little secret of their political beliefs.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: duchessofsucksit; meagain; meagainfarthole; meghan; meghanmarkle; oprahwinfrey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: C19fan
Why limit herself to Democrats? The Republican arm of the Uni party would love her.
21
posted on
03/16/2021 7:34:35 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: C19fan
Michael Avenatti is still available as a running mate.
22
posted on
03/16/2021 7:37:10 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: a fool in paradise
Also I thought she had to give up her US citizenship to marry Harry, but I could be mistaken about that
23
posted on
03/16/2021 7:37:30 AM PDT
by
longfellowsmuse
(last of the living nomads)
To: longfellowsmuse
Never gave up us citizenship. Never became a British citizen.
24
posted on
03/16/2021 7:43:59 AM PDT
by
gcparent
(MAGA)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
victimhood as a platform for launching a political career.
Well it seems to work on the various reality talent shows.
Every contestant must have a sob story to tell before they get to perform.
Reminds of a show from the 1950s (and yes I am that old) called QUEEN FOR A DAY where housewife would tell their stories of woe and at the end of the show the audience voted and one of them got their “wish”.
25
posted on
03/16/2021 7:45:34 AM PDT
by
CIB-173RDABN
(I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
To: C19fan
Like the current VP, she’s a half black whore.
26
posted on
03/16/2021 7:48:45 AM PDT
by
EEGator
To: allendale
That is what I thought in 2008 re Obama. Who would have guessed that 7 years after 9/11 we would elect somebody named Hussein to the presidency. I think one could make the case that we have been living on borrowed time ever since.
To: C19fan
Just like ABCCBSCNNNBCNPRNYTWAPO promoted the con artist lawyer Michael Avenatti for President.
Tabloids gotta tabloid.
If Elvis isn't spotted on Mars, the Trollop's gotta "be in discussions" about "running for President".
Normally manure is sold in bags or by the cubic yard, except when it comes to ABCCBSCNNNBCNPRNYTWAPO where they sell it through the screen of a television, smartphone, or computer.
To: C19fan

the little strumpet has a better shot at becoming Queen...
29
posted on
03/16/2021 7:56:31 AM PDT
by
Chode
(Ashli Babbitt - #SayHerNAME)
To: ScubaDiver
She has a better chance of becoming Queen. Way betterYou, sir, are correct.
Being "racist" in 2021 is MUCH worse than being Catholic in 1688.
A Parliament drowning in postcolonialism and white guilt might very well change the line of succession and spark Glorious Revolution 2.0, sending for Harry and Meghan, the perfect 21st century version of William and Mary.
30
posted on
03/16/2021 7:59:16 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
To: C19fan
Markle is so self-absorbed. She wants to be the first woman President? Has she not heard about Kamel-toe, er Kamala Harris who has already been selected to succeed Slow Joe Biden?
31
posted on
03/16/2021 8:00:57 AM PDT
by
LottieDah
( Biden/Harris are in and America is lost)
To: gcparent
I thought there was something about accepting foreign titles, though?
32
posted on
03/16/2021 8:01:32 AM PDT
by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them wthaith a pitchfork!)
To: bigbob
But she would have to give Monica that dress back before the ‘Pubbies would accept her.
33
posted on
03/16/2021 8:03:59 AM PDT
by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them wthaith a pitchfork!)
To: C19fan
when she became the duchess of anything she lost her eligibility to be president or american for that matter.
34
posted on
03/16/2021 8:07:46 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
To: C19fan
35
posted on
03/16/2021 8:14:06 AM PDT
by
Leep
(Save America. Lock down Joe Biden!)
To: C19fan
was networking among senior Democrats
= = =
Better network with Joe quick before he is gone.
Then Coumo who may have little time.
Then maybe Hunter.
And then the rest of the senior Democrats.
Is Bill still a Senior Democrat?
36
posted on
03/16/2021 8:15:40 AM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
To: C19fan
Meghan Markle will use the furore over her interview with Oprah The furore is over, yesterday's news. People still dislike Markle, nothing has changed.
37
posted on
03/16/2021 8:15:45 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: C19fan
Besides dutchess Pelosi is going to be the first hag to be resident.
38
posted on
03/16/2021 8:16:07 AM PDT
by
Leep
(Save America. Lock down Joe Biden!)
To: C19fan
By now several people have reviewed a Daily Mail article based around a premise, a media hook, that Meghan Markle might be “preparing a bid to become president” and that’s why she did the Oprah Winfrey interview. If you focused on that media hook, you likely missed the lede.

Media stories often contain the fingerprints of motive, a slight truth hidden in a background of obfuscation, and you can find the leftist activity if you know what to look for. The buried lede in the story is this short segment:
[…] “One senior Labour figure – a veteran of Tony Blair’s Downing Street administration with strong links to Washington – claimed to The Mail on Sunday that Ms Markle, 39, was networking among senior Democrats“… (read more)
There it is: “networking among senior Democrats.” That’s the data point to focus on.
That’s the part of the story that tells us exactly what was going on in that Oprah interview; and it is exactly what we suspected it was HERE and HERE.
Of course she was “networking” with “senior Democrats”, specifically she was networking with Obama’s Chicago crew; and that leads to Oprah, Obama’s biggest narrative engineer.
The Markle interview was purposefully orchestrated, racism claims intentionally injected, recorded, and then timed to be released/broadcast the day before the trial against Derek Chauvin while the George Floyd protestors were activated. This is how the Obama crew operate. This is how the leftists work. None of this is accidental and that statement by the “senior Labour figure” is 100% correct…. except for the cover story to hide the motive.
As we shared last week:
“People who have watched the way the Obama team use pop culture to advance Marxist political objectives have already seen through the ruse of the Meghan Markle comments with Oprah Winfrey. It was not accidental the interview comments about racism were organized, timed and released to coincide with the George Floyd trial in Minnesota. It’s how the cultural Marxists work.
If any group of people can see through to the orchestration of this, it is you, the CTH community. We have researched the Obama use of racism as a political tool for years; that technique includes using media figures like Oprah. The Chicago fingerprints of the familiar architects are clear as day on this ridiculous story.”
“Considering the Oprah angle; and considering Oprah is one of the primary conduits, advance agents and protectors of all things related to President Obama; it would not be surprising to discover that Obama’s team of Chicago provocateurs are in the close-background of the Markle network. Useful division based on advancement of racist accusations is a classic Maoist approach to achieve modern Marxist outcomes.”
Well, there you have it. Today we discover that prior to the interview: “Ms Markle, 39, was networking among senior Democrats.“
Any questions?

39
posted on
03/16/2021 8:18:04 AM PDT
by
Bratch
To: C19fan
I hear she will also be the first woman of color astronaut to step on Mars. The idiotic Daily Mail told me that.
40
posted on
03/16/2021 8:19:29 AM PDT
by
dead
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPC8zB-JPSg)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson