Replies

Where is the evidence White knew MaCauley at all? Why did he not mention her at all in his 191 page deposition?

Seth Rich was murdered on July 10, 2016 and MaCauley was murdered on July 8, two days earlier. In his deposition to Lin Wood, White spoke about Seth Rich and was asked on pages 9 and 10 if he knew of any other murders. He did not mention MaCauley. Since these murders were two days apart, if they were related, it is kind of strange that he did not mention her when asked directly.

According to the docket, he was in custody on Apri 22, 2016. I do not have access to the full case file. If he was in custody the entire time until his release, which is likely since this was a federal case, it is unlikely he was talking to either Rich or MaCauley for reasons which should be obvious.

Have you looked at the Leonardo SPA case? It is a case of insider stealing company info, where the defendant is now making claims about the U.S. election, in relation to the Scytl server story. Both the Scytl server and Leonardo SPA case have been dropped by conspiracy theorists when they realized they was nothing to them. Also, this is one more story that is not in his deposition.

White is taking his claims about the U.S. elections, an unsolved murder, and two dead conspiracies and rolling them all together. That he keeps embellishing his story is one more warning sign he is making it up.

If he has so many degrees, where are the records, peer reviewed papers, classmates, teachers, yearbooks, newspapers articles about a child prodigy, etc? Where is your evidence White was framed in 2015, other than his word?

Trying to say the Government made it go away is the same thing Bob Lazar tried in the 1980s, when he claimed the Government was covering up UFOs. He was eventually rejected because schools and employers did not back up the degrees or jobs he claimed he had. Did that make everyone else who denied his claims part of a conspiracy against him?

Look at Joe Arapio and Orly Taitz going after Obama's birth certificate. Regardless of where Obama was born, they did a lousy job of it. When people realized that no matter what the truth was, these two were never to find it, they were gradually ignored and called out. Does saying they did a lousy job and ignoring them make people Obama supporters for it?

What I have seen, is that stories like these tend to grow until two things happen. The closer a cases gets to court, the less conspiracy theorist talk about it since they don't like rules of evidence, cross examination or opposing witnesses. Otherwise, the story gets so preposterous it reaches a peak, then it drops off, then is quietly dropped. Then another tall tale comes along repeating the pattern.

If I think person is a fraud, I will say so and why. If I think were are being taken for fools, I will say so and why. If people do like it, that is their choice.