O.K.
I get your point.
However, then my questions would be:
that does not the analysis suggest more caution is needed when giving the vaccine to those with pre-existing comorbidity issues
and
does not that suggest the vaccines have the most risk for a group - already medically vulnerable - that the vaccines are considered most needed for
but also that MOST other groups do not have the same (as high) risks post-vaccine as the already medically vulnerable groups???
And all of that is statistically (odds) speaking, and even while higher risk still not what even most who are already medically vulnerabl are seeing?
And therefor what should MOST people see in all of that?
Yes, the early data in this gene therapy experiment (and this is an experiment) strongly suggests that older people (Norway picks 75 as a cutoff date) and frail (Norway picks Clinical Frailty Scale 8 or higher) patients should not be vaccinated.
And yes, the vaccines definitely do have “the most risk for an already medically vulnerable group that the vaccines are considered most needed for.” Ironic, isn’t it?
And yes, “most other groups do not have the same risks post-vaccines as the already medically vulnerable groups.” The under 60 groups only had 10% of the total deaths.
But, keep in mind there are other risks that they have. Statistically the younger group have a higher amount of adverse reactions than the older group which is attributed to stronger immune systems. One researcher said that they are seeing 10 times more adverse reactions with this program than they see with the flu vaccines.
And, of course, the younger group has less overall risk from covid.