Q did make predictions, Here is every QAnon prediction that’s failed to come true. Q started off making very specific predictions. When those did not come true, Q became vague and cryptic and asked questions without giving answers.In January, when someone on twitter posted that Biden faked being in the Oval Office and was on a movie, Q supporters were digging through Q drops to find where it was predicted. Q has made predictions, and Q followers interpret the drops as predictions.
It is not fair for Q supporters to say now Q never made predictions, when Q drops were clearly predictions and interpreted that way. and then shift the blame. If people are misintepreting Q, then it is on Q to clear it up. Q doesn't do that and none of Q's supporters try to hold Q accountable for anything.
The people who created Q came out and said it was a hoax, when analysis of Q indicated it was a hoax, it allgets ingored and dismissed. When Microchip explained how he helped create Q, Q responsed with drop #2125. I explained here how Q edited a discord screen shot and lied to discredit Microchip.
Why would Q need to fake a screenshot and lie about timestamps to discredit someone, if Q is real?
Who would do that, someone deep in the U.S. government, or the types who hang out on 4chan?
I got your post last night, but something came up and could not respond until today.
Did you even read that hit piece you linked to? Many of the so call failed predictions were things like “The Pope is going to have a bad May” And his reasoning for this “prediction” being wrong is that all that happened was a bunch of bishops resigned for sexual misconduct.
That's all, nothing to see here. Just a bunch of bishops involved in who knows what, no big deal.
The writer also refers to the people who research Q drops as “Q believers”. And when the researchers get it wrong, he claims it is a Q prediction fail.
So, I think Q is on the inside of the admin. This writer evidently thinks Q is on the outside, since those are the only two choices. Then he uses a term like “believer” to insult me, and I'm to take him seriously?
Because I think Q is on the inside, I'm not going to second guess his posts. But the big, humongous elephant in the room is how can you square that the man who coined the term “fake news” somehow, does not really care about “fake news”. That somehow, he really doesn't care if himself and his supporters are possibly being used in a nefarious deep state plot?