Agreed. And if someone does some ‘jackassin - makes claims without even a modicum of evidence or documentation, I believe it’s appropriate to call out that post/poster.
Otherwise, we’re opening up discussions to use a standard of objective truth - whatever happens to be in vogue at the moment.
Agreed. And if someone does some ‘jackassin - makes claims without even a modicum of evidence or documentation, I believe it’s appropriate to call out that post/poster.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And that can be done in a courteous manner. I would prefer to use the phrase “ask for sources/documentation” rather than “call out”, which assumes the caller outer knows All and the other guy knows squat. Which might or might not be the case.
In connection to Q messages, which is the original topic of this thread, all those who claim that Q is bogus etcetc seem to have never actually read all the Q messages but only what others, including the Fake New, say about Q, often using the term “Qanon” which Q has never used, and people who dicuss Q messages never use. I have yet to see someone who dislikes/hates/thinks Q is CIA/larp etc ever discuss the actual messages. Maybe one phrase without any context, and alwys with a nasty attitude.
People who come on the Q threads with actual questions and a non-aholery attitude are get courtesty in return.