Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sidebar Moderator
In all honesty, I can not explain that. Is it persuasive circumstantial evidence? Absolutely. There are strong arguments on both sides. Unlike the Q antagonists, I remain open to being convinced either way.

There is only one explanation. He didn't (and doesn't) want it shut down. He had every opportunity up to being asked point blank in front of cameras (twice) about it.

Who among us believes he had no idea what the Q movement was? He knew what kind of people they were (the kind that liked him) but didn't know anything else about it? Really?

Funny thing is, he could STILL shut it down with a word, especially considering its being used as 'the big lie' in the derps' power schemes.

So there's that.


116 posted on 03/06/2021 8:51:26 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: bagster
He knew what kind of people they were (the kind that liked him)

Minor correction: the kind who LOVE him ;-)

120 posted on 03/06/2021 8:57:47 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson