Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: magglepuss
Thank you.

If you don’t mind, can you tell me what good argument the other side has?

Don't mind all. As just one example, we were told that on a certain date mass arrests were to occur. The antagonists argue that this proves Q is a LARP. On the other hand, Q proponents have a compelling rebuttal: the false prediction was tactical, meant as a decoy to keep deep state operatives off the scent. And on and on it goes. Each side makes a compelling case. People who believe Q are smart, perfectly rational people; they are not "paranoid conspiracists" and they are right to be skeptical and questioning. I find that criticism of them is often unfair and can be over the top. But the antagonists are equally smart people.

Hence, I find myself on the fence.

103 posted on 03/06/2021 6:48:31 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Sidebar Moderator

As just one example, we were told that on a certain date mass arrests were to occur.


Again, it is so nice to be able to have a real conversation, and not like what normally happens with the name calling.

Ok, I am pretty much 100% sure that Q has NEVER made a prediction like that. That is so much a huge part of the disconnect. For some reason, people cannot understand that those types of dates and names are coming from posters wrongly speculating, not Q.

For example, before the 2018 election, Q said something like the election is safe. I may not have that exact. Also was a comment that the Senate was what was important. Anyway, what many people read instead was: we will win the house and senate. That is NOT what was said.

Q has never ever been about predicting things. Q has only ever been about exposing things. Even our own side believes that the left is corrupt. I posit that this fight is not between left or right, but good vs. evil. For some reason we are getting push back from our own on exposing evil.

I just don’t believe that DJT did not know about Q. It would be reckless for him to not put a stop to it if he was unaware of the operation.

I don’t believe that the man who coined the term “fake news” did not have a plan for going around the “fake news” to get information to the people.

I don’t believe that a man who fired Dennis Rodman for a misspelling does not care about spelling in his own tweets. These misspellings are many times proofs used in Q decodes.

I don’t believe that the man who wrote “The art of the Deal”, isn’t fully engulfed with “The Art of War” strategies

I don’t believe that a man who wrote an entire chapter of his book about getting even, and going so far as unfriending someone who was a doormat, is not going to get even with the blatantly corrupt in our govt.

I just don’t believe that the man who risked his life, and his families lives to try to right our govt. is just going to walk away from the treasonous acts of stealing an election. Plus, wouldn’t not exposing that treason be in and of itself, treason?

The antagonists may be smart, but they are not IMHO logical.


104 posted on 03/06/2021 7:41:34 AM PST by magglepuss (I will always stand with the Constitution, with no apologies. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: Sidebar Moderator
But the antagonists are equally smart people. Hence, I find myself on the fence.

There is only one truth. Either Q is a thing or its not a thing.


123 posted on 03/06/2021 9:01:26 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson