It’s easier to believe the claimed 14th Amendment scenario if you instead think of the Woodrow Wilson and FDR eras imo, these Democratic presidents blatantly ignoring the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers imo.
The word “sovereign” doesn't appear in the Constitution or its amendments, so I don't know where these people are coming from with their “sovereign citizen” argument.
"Americans who believe taxes, ...”
Nineteenth century Supreme Court justices had clarified that the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers include limited power to appropriate taxes, only enough taxes to pay for Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited power duties and a few other constitutionally enumerated expenses.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Again, particularly since the time of FDR era, the feds have not only based domestic policy on stolen state powers, but also state revenues uniquely associated with those powers, the feds stealing state revenues by means of unconstitutional federal taxes.
"US currency, …"
First, Thomas Jefferson had noted that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) had considered giving express, Section 8 power to regulate INTRAstate banking to Congress, but had decided against it.
"It is known that the very power now proposed as a means was rejected as an end by the Convention which formed the Constitution. A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank, which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution [emphasis added]." —Thomas jefferson, Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank, 1791.
Next, patriots are reminded that the delegates to the Con-Con had expressly constitutionally given Congress the specific power to make and regulate the value only of coin money, regardless whether Congress wants that power or not.
So not only did Woodrow Wilson wrongly politically repeal a part of the Constitution's Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 when he signed the bill that established the Federal Reserve into law, that clause giving Congress the specific power to regulate the value of coin money, but he also wrongly weakened citizen voting power since citizens have always indirectly had the power to regulate the value of money by electing lawmakers who have that power.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof [emphasis added], and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;"
Also, paper money is unconstitutional imo, Clause 5 also expressly giving Congress the specific power only to coin money, no specific power to print money, the states even making the Constitution’s Article I, Section 10, Clause 4 to prohibit themselves from making paper money regardless of their 10th Amendment-protected power to do so otherwise.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: To coin Money [emphasis added], regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;"
"Article I, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts [emphases added]; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."
"and even the US government to be illegitimate …,”
In the context that today’s very corrupt, election stealing, Democratic-controlled federal government is wrongly basing so-called federal domestic policy on state powers that it has stolen from the states, the unconstitutionally big US government is illegitimate imo.
In fact, citizens can bet that if a federal domestic spending program is not reasonably related to the US Post Service then it is unconstitutional and win the bet probably most of the time.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;”
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Q Anon is the Alien visited us History Channel of the Conservative movement.
Listening to Trump’s CPAC speech. Sure doesn’t SOUND like he’s planning to take over again soon.
Utter tripe and nonsense. Trump made very clear yesterday he lost-—illegally, but is NOT president-—and also made clear he “may” run in 2024.
Just like every other stupid Q-tip date that is thrown out-—”but once Sessions resigns, THEN the crap will hit the fam”
-—”The Horowitz Report”
-—”The Horowitz Report vol. 2”
-—”Huber”
-—”Durham”
-—”Whitaker”
-—”Barrstool”
-—”December 14!”
-—”Pence on Jan. 6”
-—so now it’s March 4, huh?
This is MSM manufactured BS.
This is what actual Anons where “Q” posts are saying about it:
ANONS
I have a feeling that this MSM-manufactured idea that “we” believe that
Trump will be inaugurated on Thursday is gaslighting. They are laying the
groundwork for a falseflag, which they will blame on us and say we did it
because we were mad that March 4 didn’t habben.
Keep your heads on a swivel, and denounce this ******* ******** notion
that Trump is getting inaugurated this week.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Just for a touch of perspective...
~Easy