Posted on 02/26/2021 9:26:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
This is similar to Tamiflu for the ordinary influenza. When used within the first three days of the onset of symptoms, it greatly reduces the severity of your symptoms and the length of your sickness. After three days it does not work. Anyone who runs an experiment with Tamiflu on people who have had influenza for 10 days will find that it is worthless.
How do you take it - on a cracker, in a capsule, straight up, etc?
I never taken anything outside of my daily regimen of vitamins and various supplements but I’m thinking of getting a supply of ivermectin just to have on standby..... I wouldn’t plan to take it but if for some reason I feel it’s warranted (either am sure I was exposed to WuFlu or perhaps came down it it), then at least I would have it handy.
Does that sound like a reasonable plan? Or is it too late at that point to take ivermectin and it needs to be taken earlier than that to do its job?
Follow up question is this... Does Ivermectin have any side effects that one needs to be aware of?
Try getting this. Doctors have been ordered not to give ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine out to patients. My friend Dr Simone Gold was fired for giving them out anyways
Because ivermectin is only 75% effective as a fragment and vaccines are now demonstrates to be 92% effective at PREVENTING disease. As well as 100% effective at eliminating severe disease.
In other words the vaccine is 100% effective at preventing disease progressing and stops the disease greater than 9 in 10 times. Ivermectin still has a 1 in 4 shot at failing and allowing severe disease or death.
RE: My friend Dr Simone Gold was fired for giving them out anyways
My heart goes out to her. But she is not alone in her brave fight against the bureaucracy.
Here is a website to look at:
Directory of Doctors Prescribing Effective Outpatient COVID-19 Therapy
SecAmndmt wrote: “If one takes proper daily quantities of vitamins A, Bcomplex, c, D3, zinc and iodine, and maintain D levels in the blood, there is little or no illness from viral infection”
If you believe that, then you must also believe that almost every medical professional in the world is a part of a gargantuan conspiracy to suppress that information.
If you get covid just pop one of your dog’s heartworm pills.
We have that Fraud Fauci to thank for that.
Here is what I found on the net.
I-MASK treatment protocol for ivermectin, regularly updated on this site:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/i-mask-prophylaxis-treatment-protocol/i-mask-protocol-translations/
(click link with american flag)
How can you make these statements (92% effective in preventing, for the patient's lifetime?), and within the remaining 8%, eliminate all severe disease, (for the patient's lifetime?). So where is the mention of the mRNA 'vaccines' that cause side-effects and their percentages? And why do you think they are better than Dr. Zelenko's original HCQ; zinc sulfate; azithromycin/ doxycycline; D3, which had single-digit deaths from over 1000 patients, and natural immunity from the rest of the patients?
I didn’t make those claim. However the very large study punished our id Israel made those claims.
he had a video up of him popping the pills when he was sick.
i think zinc is included but cant remember for sure. I remember something with iodine in it as well
a lot of his videos have been taken down either by him or facebook
Straight up. Run it out on my finger tip. Taste isn’t too bad. Apple is stretching it
Because ivermectin is only 75% effective as a fragment....
.... and vaccines are now demonstrates to be 92% effective at PREVENTING disease. As well as 100% effective at eliminating severe disease.
Do you happen to have links to studies, or Pfizer or Moderna statements, confirming that their experimental ‘vaccines’ are “92% effective at preventing disease”, and are “100% effective at eliminating severe disease”??
TIA.
As far as your statement about Ivermectin only being 75% effective....that is not what MULTIPLE studies, from around the globe have said.
For example...
Regarding the reduction in the risk of developing a severe form of the disease, it (Ivermectin) appears, like with the Argentinian study, and with the same caveats, to be 100%.
https://www.ejmed.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/599/337
Many more studies, on the effectiveness of Ivermectin, here...
https://c19ivermectin.com/#prep
From above link (much more info, at link)....
•100% of the 42 studies to date report positive effects. Random effects meta-analysis for early treatment and pooled effects shows a reduction of 83%, RR 0.17 [0.11-0.28].
Prophylactic use shows a reduction of 89%, RR 0.11 [0.05-0.23]. Mortality results show 75% lower mortality, RR 0.25 [0.14-0.44] for all treatment delays, and 86% lower, RR 0.14 [0.03-0.62] for early treatment.
•100% of the 21 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated reduction of 70%, RR 0.30 [0.19-0.49].
•The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 42 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 4 trillion (p = 0.00000000000023).
There is independent data released yesterday out of a large Israel study. Please understand this is quantified data that is well powered.
“Does Ivermectin have any side effects that one needs to be aware of?”
I am 81 and took a pea-size bit of horse Ivermectin gel 2 days in a row. Drink a glass of water after you swallow it. It is a wormer so you may notice a little difference in the bathroom the next day, if you know what I mean. It gave me a slight metallic taste in the mouth that went away after a half-day.
I’ll wait to see the actual studies/confirmation data (I couldn’t find an actual link to the Israel study, only reports), from MORE than ONE country.
As there is also this ...
A pair of researchers from Canada are urging governments to hold off on the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine....
Lol - thanks. I’ve got some of the “apple” stuff, just haven’t pulled the trigger on taking it yet.
“If you believe that, then you must also believe that almost every medical professional in the world is a part of a gargantuan conspiracy to suppress that information.”
No. Allopathic medicine has a religious devotion to their sacred cow of vaccination. There is no conspiracy, but lots of pride, ego and arrogance. Any conventional MD who steps out of line faces sanctions or de-licensing. And our FR MDs in these vaccine threads join in the ridicule of anyone who does not tow the line.
Other type of medicine (naturopathy, chiro, homeopathy, Eastern medicine etc) do not have a religious devotion to vaccination.
Allopathy aka the Rockefeller model of Pharma medicine has been dominant for a century.
Having ex-inlaws who are pediatric specialists (3 of them), I know the mindset really well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.