[mabarker1]

If a chest hit, a 40cal at that range would be a through and through and Mass blood.

It’s 16th March 1897 in Chicago. Two men stand face-to-face in a huge square, one pointing a revolver at the other. It seems like the whole city is there watching: the mayor, the chief of police, a mob of spectators, and a priest, just in case...

https://culture.pl/en/article/the-monk-who-stopped-bullets-with-silk-inventing-the-bulletproof-vest.

[wombatsrule]

yes nice example, now swap the pistol for a 40cal hot round fill glock. Penetrate and fragment, but her tiny frame would Not be able to have held the shock waves from the impact and as it is a hollow structure , the chest, it is rip rend and tear and out the back, 12 inches at best.

Jelly rubber, mass organ rupture and out the back it drains, and it does Not look like a 3 inch puddle.

Ask someone who has seen a buddy tagged by a similar round it is Not just a paper cut.

GainI make the point he was Not using a hot round Nor was he using a target round “if we are to believe” he shot what? Not a slash from the pistol, not a tiny flash blur, you ever seen a video slomo of a pistol fire a round.

Check.