Was just reading a short play by play of the Alaska meeting:
https://twitter.com/nickschifrin/status/1372687460598226948
It’s all, the public part, PR positioning nonsense so not much caring what is said in public but it does seem to have ‘gone off the rails’.
Though that could be planned.
Only what they, and we, do matters.
Thread
See new Tweets
Conversation
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
3h
Yang then continued, raising cyber attacks—this time pausing to ensure the translator went sentence by sentence: “Whether it’s ability to launch cyber attacks, or technologies that could be deployed, the US is the champion... You can’t blame this problem on somebody else.”
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
3h
That was supposed to be it. Opening statement over, US media pool excused. But
@SecBlinken
and
@JakeSullivan46
told pool to stay: “given your extended remarks, let me add a few of my own.”
@SecBlinken
: “It’s never a good bet to bet against America.”
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
3h
And then
@JakeSullivan46
: “A confident country is able to look hard at its own shortcomings, and constantly seek to improve.”
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
Replying to
@nickschifrin
Then at 625p eastern, pool is forced to leave. But Chinese diplomats complained it wasn’t fair. Poolers
@EenaRuffini
@jakesNYT
@humeyra_pamuk
pick up the story: Yang criticized US for speaking condescendingly, and said the removal of the media proved US doesn’t support democracy.
6:12 PM · Mar 18, 2021·Twitter Web App
62
Retweets
11
Quote Tweets
186
Likes
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
3h
Replying to
@nickschifrin
And now senior US Administration makes this statement: “We will use the remaining hours to outline for Chinese delegation in private same messages delivered in public. Chinese delegation, on other hand, seems intent on grandstanding, focused on public theatrics and dramatics...
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
3h
“They made that clear by promptly violating protocol; we had agreed to short (two-minute) opening statements by each principal...”
Nick Schifrin
@nickschifrin
·
2h
Went back to the tape. For the record:
@SecBlinken
opening statement lasted 2:27.
@JakeSullivan46
opening statement 2:17. Yang Jiechi initial statement 16:14. Then 3:26 with alternating Mandarin and English. Wang Yi opening statement 4:09.
Thanks for the link!
As predicted things are icier than ever by the end of day one of the Alaska summit in which for the first time in the Biden administration high-level in-person talks were held between China and the US, including Secretary of State Antony Blinken, China’s top diplomat, Yang Jiechi, as well as State Councilor Wang Yi. By the close tomorrow it promises to border on comic shitshow levels given the public haranguing that’s already taken place.
Chinese Communist Party foreign affairs chief Yang Jiechi wasn’t impressed, going on an epic tirade filled with a litany of American “abuses” meant to answer every one of Washington’s recent criticisms of Beijing and then some. He ran with Blinken and Sullivan’s “human rights” theme and turned it around, seeking to call out Washington ‘hypocrisy’ on every point, even down to treatment of Black Americans (which presumably was Yang’s intended parallel to ethnic Uighurs).
Here’s a recap of his introductory remarks:
...Yang hit back, accusing the United States of using its military might and financial supremacy to pressure countries and of abusing national security to threaten the future of international trade.
He said Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan were all inseparable parts of Chinese territory and China firmly opposed US interference in its internal affairs.
Yang said human rights in the United States were at a low point with Black Americans being “slaughtered” and added that the United States should handle its own affairs and China its own.
Yang said it was necessary to abandon a “Cold War mentality,” and confrontation and added:
“The way we see the relationship with the United States is as President Xi Jinping has said, that is we hope to see no confrontation, no conflict, mutual respect and win-win cooperation with the United States.”
So there was at least a brief positive included by the end of his intro. Yang had further fired back at Washington’s charges that in reality “the US is the champion of cyberattacks”.
US national security adviser Jake Sullivan reportedly began the talks by telling his Chinese counterparts that “We do not seek conflict, but we welcome stiff competition, and we will always stand up for our principles, for our people, and for our friends” — noting that on the agenda for the summit is China’s crackdowns in Xinjiang province, Hong Kong and Taiwan, as well as state-sponsored cyber attacks and “economic coercion” of allies. “Each of these actions threaten the rules-based order that maintains global stability,” Sullivan underscored. He added that the “alternative” is a winner-take-all world that would be inevitably more “violent and unstable”.
As many commentators have been pointing out given the increased obviousness, there’s no daylight whatsoever between Trump’s prior China policies so heavily criticized by the Democrats and the hard-line on Beijing now clearly being pursued by Biden. For example, Bloomberg writes, “Coming into the meeting, it was increasingly clear that despite Biden’s criticism of former President Donald Trump, he’s unlikely to make major changes to his predecessor’s hard-line approach to China. On human rights in Xinjiang , on Hong Kong’s and even on tariffs, Trump-era policies remain in place.”
I would add to that last paragraph; the difference is that Trump was strong and the CCP respected him for that, Biden is a weakling and not respected.
Remember when Obama went to China and had to exit the back door with no one to greet him?
Trump said he would have turned the plane around and gone home.
When Trump visited they rolled out the red carpet for him, parades and even went to the forbidden city.