Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thinden

Roberts, Kavanaugh and ACB were the attorneys for Bush in Bush v. Gore which one would think would have made them familiar with voter fraud and the way the demo-commies try to steal elections. On the other hand they are Bush approved, meaning IMO country club deep state Rino backed judges, i.e. part of the problem with our government.

There are too many attorneys in our government, the majority of whom have no knowledge of how to run a business, cannot relate to the average citizen trying to make ends meet, nor do anything but push paper. Shakespeare wasn’t too far off when he said in Henry VI “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”


774 posted on 02/22/2021 11:00:34 AM PST by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies ]


To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

Roberts, Kavanaugh and ACB were the attorneys for Bush in Bush v. Gore which one would think would have made them familiar with voter fraud and the way the demo-commies try to steal elections. On the other hand they are Bush approved, meaning IMO country club deep state Rino backed judges, i.e. part of the problem with our government.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

thanx for dusting off the “team bush” connecstion to Roberts, Kavanaugh & ACB.

Kavanaugh was also part of the whitewater white wash.

these “favors” are not forgotten by the DS.

sometimes it may take decades to repay the debt, but they have been identified as “players” in the whole scheme of things early on


793 posted on 02/22/2021 11:55:28 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies ]

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

Roberts, Kavanaugh and ACB were the attorneys for Bush in Bush v. Gore ... [and] ... are Bush approved ...
_______________________________________________________

You may be right. Have they posted the actual opinion of the majority so we can try to understand their reasoning?

I ask because if the Secretaries of State were knowingly in collusion with foreign actors to commit election fraud, wouldn’t that make them enemy combatants? Has the USSC refused to hear the cases because they’re more appropriately handled under military law than constitutional law?

Grasping at straws is easier for me than admitting that two of PDJT’s three SC picks (K and C-B) are already outing themselves as derps and the third hasn’t been completely solid (G).


815 posted on 02/22/2021 12:54:14 PM PST by LittleLinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 774 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson