I am not sure. The interviewee references an ERCOT note for the 40% number for wind.
Again, I am not aware of any of the nuke plants being down. Of course, there are only 2 in Texas to begin with.
“The interviewee references an ERCOT note for the 40% number for wind”
And then contradicts himself a few sentences later.
You can’t say that ‘wind turbines are expected top proved 25 percent and produced half that’ and then also claim ‘40 of the loss is due to the wind turbines not working.
It’s just lying BS to cover for people too stupid or greedy to prepare for the worst-case scenario, being siezed upon by people with an anti-renewable agenda