Are Democrats Creating Two Americas?

American Thinker ^ | 17 Feb, 2021 | J. Robert Smith

[MtnClimber]

Is it possible to create parallel Americas without instigating a separation?

In Year One of the Biden Revolutionary Calendar, Democrats, the left, and the globalist clique are in high spirits. They’ve resumed the four years stalled wonderous “transformation” of America, and they’re doing so with a literal vengeance. These Jacobins won’t end up transforming the country, though. No, what they’re setting in motion is the law of unintended consequences. They want to radically change America through sheer imposition, dominance, and by curtailing basic rights. In fact, as this is written, they’re off to a swell start driving a deeper wedge between Americans. Might they wind up creating two Americas?

Starting things off, the Jacobins have Gorilla-glued a pen into the withered hand of Joe Biden. He’s signed a bevy of executive orders as if he’s a preprogrammed, personality-free Disney animatron, which he may be. The goal is to undo the magnificent work of the cabal’s scourge, Donald J. Trump, who, for these revanchists, is Louis XVI and Cromwell rolled into one. The hard-earned successes of President Trump -- from the economy to the border wall to winding down forever wars are intolerable testaments to free, traditional America, which the Jacobins have spent decades deprecating.

Consequently, government by fiat is the rage -- and necessary -- because the Democrat-controlled Congress has been frying bigger fish. In step with Biden’s pledge to build unity, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer pursued Trump again -- and whiffed again in prosecuting persecuting him.

[central_va]

So we do nothing and slip quietly into the night.

[unread]

"Is it possible to create parallel Americas without instigating a separation?"

I don't know.. Maybe we should ask the folks in the Balkans.. /s

[_longranger81]

No, it means we need to take time to think things through and plan, and calculate the consequences of our actions before taking them. When you find yourself doing exactly what your enemy wants you to do, don’t.

[central_va]

In other world we slip quietly into that dark night...

[eeriegeno]

Actually it is year zero. Though it is the first year of the glorious revolution.

Actually, I disagree. Year zero of the psychological operation takeover was last year when the coronavirus provided an opportunity for the deep state to scare the hell out of the citizenry which allowed the packed lower courts to seriously modify our voting system. The race riots of 2020 were instrumental in their plan too. The stolen election was the icing on the coup.

I know! I know! The election is over and there was NO election fraud. But just to ease my mind it would be nice to have independent forensic audits of ballots and voting machines in six states as was done in Antrim County Michigan. Is that asking too much? Aren't those who are in power interested in 'unity?'

[Gen.Blather]

A group, any group, be it a country or a company, is like hundreds, thousands or millions of individuals each going his own way. Brownian motion, if you will. The larger entity, the country or company, is a blanket thrown over the whole lot. Occasionally, the blanket may, through a combination of random events, appear to move one way or another. A distant observer would say, ah-ha, the country or company is doing this or that. In reality, it is just the combination of lots of individual actions.

There has always been two Americas, and three, or four, or 330 million.

[central_va]

The (USC) United States of Corona.

[Renkluaf]

Obviously, all/most of this would be challenged in SCOTUS. But, the Roberts Court has already indicated through its actions that it is adverse to interfering with changes passed by a legislature. His idea of “protecting” the integrity of the court rather then the integrity of the constitution.

[cableguymn]

No.

They already have.

[Fiji Hill]

Indeed, there are two Americas. At my church and in the online classes that I am taking are many who live in a totally different world. They get their news from CNN or MSNBC, think Dr. Fauci is the Messiah and equate the Capitol riot with the Pearl Harbor and 9/11 attacks.

[Bratch]

Lee Smith Nails It, The Elites “Want Us To Know” They Hold all Power and Control

Posted on February 15, 2021 by Sundance

---

[...]

The question “do the elites care if we know” is accurately answered by “they want people to know.”  The outlook that elites are hypocritical is the wrong nuance to what is visible. Their openness about their untouchable constructs is part of their purpose.

“Elitism” in its most raw and brutal display is a system of people who are beyond reproach according to their own outlook.  They must not be questioned; they are in ultimate control of society, outcomes or (fill_in_the_blank) as an extension of their self-proclaimed magnanimity.  Essentially they are projecting their position inside a club and all those not in the club are outsiders who do not get to provide input or judgement on the club rules.

This might sound like a DUH statement from the literal definition of “elitism”; however, it must be accepted this outlook is one of consumption, not determination.  They believe they represent the ‘greater good’ and by extension control moral authority.  Thus, within their mind, they are above reproach.  The visible outcome is they operate outside the systems they push upon others who are not in the club.

Elites do not have to wear masks (Pelosi hair salon); or elites do not have to abide by group and social distance rules (Newsom at restaurant party); or elites do not have to concern themselves for carbon emissions (Kerry private airline travel); or elites do not have to worry about the justice system (Clinton emails, Comey FBI lies), etc.

This is NOT hypocrisy, this is a fundamental part of creating a classist society.

Those within the club, in this example the DC club, want those outside the club to accept there are two systems of rights and responsibilities.   The club members have all powerful rights and no responsibilities for consequences; the non club members have lesser rights and full responsibility for consequences.  This is the cornerstone of a tiered or classist society outlook.

“Rules for thee and not for me” is more than a catch phrase; it is an actual worldview with a history in political control.  They are not hypocrites, they are living out their creed.

The outlook gained popularity going all the way back to the formation of the Fabian Socialist society.  You might remember George Bernard Shaw saying “at a certain point those [outside the club] will have to justify their existence.”  Shaw was advocating for a genetic cleansing of those undeserving people who take more from society more than they provide in value.

This Fabian Socialist outlook is the most extreme form of “elitism”, the actual extermination of undesirables, but it is essentially along the same continuum as believing their are two sets of rules depending on your place in the hierarchy of society.

This outlook has been modernized to include the latest industry of Big Tech.  Those who control technocracy have merged with those who control the politics of society.  The outcome is elites deciding which voices are allowed to participate in the national conversation, and which voices must be ostracized because they are not compliant to the elitist worldview.

It is critical, actually beyond critical, that people start to accept what they are witnessing is not some misplaced system created by bad actors.  Those bad actors are actually elites who benefit from numbing society to the sheer audacity of their ideology.

Again, we return to this image….

…. And I pray that people will pause, stand back and contemplate just what follows the natural conclusion of events if these ideological “elites” are not confronted.  That image is not far away from where we are today.

[...]

---

[Redmen4ever]

three Americas: it’s both ends against the middle. The elites and the welfare recipients versus the middle class.

[Peter W. Kessler]

Agree. It was well underway when Obama took charge. He continued to divide, divide, divide.

President Trump made great inroads to halt the progress of the fissure, but four years weren’t enough. The “progressives” knew that another four years would set them back 20 years, so they rigged the election in favor of a demented stooge.

Now their mission is to build a wall between us and themselves. The U.S. might just become a gigantic collection of right wing ghettos, from which there will be no escape.

Until the trains come...

[Ponyexpress9790]

Exactly. The Democrats are willing to go where rational people won’t. If I know the line you will not cross, I will have nothing to stop me from crossing any line. They will keep doing what they want to do, and nobody can or will stop them. If you have a gun but are afraid to pull the trigger, I can come at you with a knife and get away with it. This has ALWAYS been the Democrat’s strategy.

[_longranger81]

Evidently you believe there are only two possible courses of action: impulsive reaction without consideration of strategy or nothing.

I think you’re wrong. I think our opponent has been planning this for 90 years, through several generations of Frankfort School Communists. And I think they have been thinking eight steps ahead of you. And we need to look at the battlefield and figure out a strategy that will destroy them instead of us.

But maybe your way is better. Maybe this time the Charge of the Light Brigade will win. If they just have enough passion. If they just get mad enough and aim really, really well.

But I wouldn’t bet on it. I won’t bet on it. I’d bet on planning.