To: qaz123
HOLD ON... why the WHOLE state?
dems usually control 10% of the land of a state.
which means there would be many reds ‘behind enemy lines’
succession by DISTRICTS
22 posted on
02/16/2021 10:15:41 PM PST by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style )
To: sten
How about EVERY state splits in two - North and South. Might be a problem - and maybe unnecessary - for the Carolina, the Dakotas and WV. Easier to resettle and draw boundaries.
26 posted on
02/17/2021 3:28:22 AM PST by
NTHockey
(My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: sten
The whole state(s). Anything else complicates an already complacent issue.
30 posted on
02/17/2021 11:01:53 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: sten
Whole states vote and whole states leave. If later you want to do some subdividing do that on your own time...
33 posted on
02/17/2021 11:05:22 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson