[nathanbedford]

Meanwhile “cases, cases, cases” and “deaths attributed to China Virus continue to plummet.

Precisely, why do we care how many cases there are? The only issue is how many deaths? Does not the vaccine afford the vulnerable a high level of immunity?

Who cares if an eighteen-year-old gets the virus? We should all care very much if an eighty-year-old gets the virus but we can presumably protect the eighty-year-old with an injection.

Why do we concern ourselves about herd immunity, we should have focused on the aged and infirm from the very beginning but this myopic obsession with people who are relatively immune to death from this virus has no doubt endangered hundreds of thousands of aged and infirm people.

[RinaseaofDs]

If you take the vaccine, wait 90 days, and you still have to mask and are deemed a spread risk, it isn’t a vaccine.

And this whole thing is one big human experimentation exercise. They will use this event to justify further breaches of medical ethics.

[billyboy15]

I agree 100% with all you say.

[dangus]

>> Who cares if an eighteen-year-old gets the virus? <<

I said last summer that we ought to let it burn hot and burn out... Let acquired-immunity young people become a fireline. And I believe that’s what we’re REALLY seeing now.