The Washington Post again shows how incompetent its reporting is since they didn’t list the so-called “ingredients” alleged in Subway’s tuna, something that should have been found on the original lawsuit complaint.
Somebody is lying, covering up, or totally incompetent. Perhaps all 3 and its’ not just the plaintiff and their possible frivolous and criminal extortion lawsuit.
Here is a bigger story than fake tuna salad:
That the WaPoPo decides to run a story based entirely on an email from the lawyer of the (unknown) plaintiff.
They toss in a random quote from the company's PR firm, to make it seem "balanced".
The new kids in "journalism" are just lazy shills looking for a bad byline in a crummy bar.
And this puff piece ran after being reviewed by the WaPoPo editors?