Thanks for posting Juan’s latest, SF!
It’s too bad some people (around here) trust their own intuition—even to keep from listening while implicitly preaching others to do likewise—more than that of someone with Juan’s extensive intel background and current Q associations.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ermm...he’s still anonymous, not validated by Q. He’s been around awhile - so has Alex Jones. Just sayin’....
In this sort of situation, I operate under these rules:
1. Everything is data; there is no such thing as too much data.
2. All data is "good" or "bad" depending on verification of the data. "Good" data is that which has been verified by independent and reliable sources, "Bad" data lacks that verification and there is no deadline or schedule on verification pro/con.
3. The worst thing you can do when collecting data is form an affection for certain types or limit the number of points to be analyzed.
(This is all stuff I picked up in my Aerospace career. Check the story of the Lockheed Electra for the motivation for my attitude.)