[TangoLimaSierra]

56-44 in favor of the question “Is it constitutional to impeach a former President.?”

So when Trump comes back and goes after obammy, Clinton and Bush they can't say squat.

[edh]

“So when Trump comes back and goes after obammy, Clinton and Bush they can’t say squat.”

I never considered this ... good catch! :-)

[Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.]

And when Trump goes after Senators and House members current and former, they can’t say anything either.

[bitt]

So when Trump comes back and goes after obammy, Clinton and Bush they can’t say squat.

~~~~~

hmmm,, interdasting!

[stylin19a]

>>56-44 in favor of the question “Is it constitutional to impeach a former President.?<<

I don't think that was the question? I think it was a constitutional question on trying him.

>>So when Trump comes back and goes after obammy, Clinton and Bush they can't say squat<<

Not sure how that could even start to work...DJTrump was POTUS when he was impeached. Neither Presidents Bush nor Obama was impeached. And, and how does anybody get another bite out of the Pres. Clinton apple?

[sbnsd]

So when Trump comes back and goes after obammy, Clinton and Bush they can’t say squat.

*****
Is this the direction we’re going with this? Impeaching past presidents? I thought all of them would be charged with treason or crimes against humanity. I want them in prison or hanged, not impeached by a rogue Congress who does not follow the Constitution or any laws of the country. None of them can run for office anyway since they’ve all had their 2 terms.