J&J’s is an adenovirus vaccine. A more traditional vaccine.
at at is 60% effective instead of 95%
Could you explain that a little more?
As I understand it it is similar to the AstraZeneca Covid “vaccine”, and none of them are traditional vaccines by way of introducing a dead, partial or otherwise deneutered version of the virus into the body to train the body’s immune system to recognize it and respond positively when it sees the actual virus.
Instead, the J&J, AZ, Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” all introduce a mechanism by which the body is made to create a version of the virus spike protein that the immune system then responds to.
Still, the J&J and AZ versions, by using a virus insert platform that has been used previously and doesn’t use the nanoparticle delivery that effectively delivers this protein-creating response to every cell in the body, is presumably on some level weaker and maybe safer than the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA-containing vaccines. (It is also single-dose, cheaper and easier to handle.) Still, multiple European countries are already warning against the safety of the AZ “jab” for the elderly.