ichabod1 wrote:
“With that said it’s important to make sure that the death rate from the vax is lower than the death rate from the virus, which I’m not sure is necessarily the case here.”
Are you saying you’re not sure if the death rate from the virus is as high as is claimed?
I don’t think the covid death rate is accurate. They’ve pumped up the numbers to create maximum fear so we’ll be jostling each other to be first in line to take the mark of the beast. The number of deaths and adverse reactions to the “vaccine” should scare off all but the most vulnerable.
If someone presented me with a large bowl of skittles and said only a few were poisonous, I wouldn’t eat even one unless I was about to die from starvation. Besides, it’s not even a vaccine. It’s gene therapy in the form of messenger RNA. We have no way of knowing what the long term effects of that are. Nor will we know for quite a few years.
I don’t have numbers. I’m just saying every vaccine has a cost in terms of a small percentage who have bad reactions, and it’s important to compare the harm caused by the vax to the harm caused by the virus. I’m not sure any cost benefit analysis has ever been applied to anything having to do with covid. I sure haven’t seen any. So I don’t know. In the dark. Blind. 500 people. sounds like a lot.