Posted on 01/27/2021 6:31:38 AM PST by PIF
I blew you off with a cynical answer, which wasn't helpful. This is a more appropriate reply.
Yes, I believe I am qualified. I have an engineering degree from a top rated accredited university. I retired from a major corporation as the director of a technology center there. As such, part of my job was to approve and therefore edit technical papers and test reports. I approved many hundreds of them. Some of these became the basis for a UN International Standard. I have testified as an Expert Witness in a large patent lawsuit.
One of the first things I look for in any equality is "Are the units consistent?" Are the units on the left side of an equal sign the same as the units on the right side? In Engineering Mechanics, there are just two basic units of measurement, the cgs (centimeter-gram-seconds) system and the fps (foot pound-seconds) system, the Metric and the English systems. Almost all basic measurements can be defined in these systems, and units have to be consistent in all equations.
The first two items I mentioned, time is not the inverse of amplitude, and Power has different units than intensity, thus, they failed this requirement.
The next, pair production avalanche, is simply a group of meaningless buzzwords. They are undefined in the document, and their context is undefined. That's always a no-no in a valid technical paper.
The last, polarization of the local vacuum state, illustrates meaningless obfuscation. A vacuum is the absence of anything, it can't be polarized. Combining the words, local, vacuum, and state is just unnecessary fluff, to sound technical.
These four were just examples I found quickly, and I didn't want to waste any more time. The patent was full of such drivel.
According to the War Zone, this release was just a small part of the documents they received.
So if you are so knowledgeable (which I do not dispute), how come the Navy does not seem to have people with your credentials or better to say the guy is full of it, but instead presses ahead?
Either you are wrong because there are missing documents or their is some other effect which is not explained, or else you must immediately contact the Navy and tell them to stop wasting our money or just sell the works to China as a good will gesture. China Job Killer Joe will want his cut, you know. Hunter may need part of the action also.
The amount of theoretical energy in the quantum vacuum is believed to be enormous. Some estimates have energy density of enough energy in a liter of space to vaporize all the worlds oceans. Tesla was a big believer in quantum energy he called it energy in the ether since quantum physics didn’t exist yet. He was correct that energy always flows down hill from source to sink. His idea was to create a resonator that would bring the “ether” into a self resonating oscillation where the sink would be the brief periods of reversal in the resonance waves. Basically creating a lower energy state inside the vacuum chamber that once per oscillation energy flow into to it and then dissipates into the vacuum yielding a net energy flow “downhill” it would be limitless should it have worked given that the space time vacuum is also belived to be expanding and thus growing in capacity. It violates Newton since energy would be “destroyed” flowing downhill out of the known space time universe into the quantum vacuum and lost forever. Fascinating stuff.
How soon until the Clintons/Democrats sell the information to China...
.. a high end microwave frequency on the order of 1011 Hertz
1011 Hertz is not a high end microwave frequency. It is nore like the high C note on the piano. This is gibberish.
His idea was to create a resonator that would bring the “ether” into a self resonating oscillation where the sink would be the brief periods of reversal in the resonance waves.
—
Tesla was way ahead of the curve. It almost sounds like he was talking about something like the Casimir Effect where quantum fluctuations can be observed by placing two very smooth plates near enough to each other.
Would this be an acceptable response to a bio-attack?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.