How does this explain the press set up in the building across from the capitol building on inauguration day? There is a video of an overcast locale.
Seems too far for any good video. Weird. What did all those media guys think? Did they get any footage, and if so, what did they do with it?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The public had to see the press, and their satellite/broadcast vans, arriving at Capitol grounds and setting up to live broadcast the ceremony. If no one saw press entering/leaving the Capitol it wouldn't "look right".
But the strangeness continues - the press were too far away to see much. Why?
Because if they were closer the MSM cameras would reveal those 100 people taking part in the inauguration were stand ins - not the people in question. That makes the pretend administration "FAKE" to the second power, or just FAKE².
The average American doesn't have camera equipment that could expose the fact that Biden/Kamala/Pence were not present. At the distance shown, I doubt the media does either.
So the MSM all show up on a cloudy, overcast day and film from too far away a group of 100 stand-ins going through the motions at high noon. At the same time, what they are broadcasting to the world is close-up, pre-recorded, edited footage taken on a very sunny "dress rehearsal" morning.
Which means Biden probably wasn't even on that plane they breathlessly filmed landing at the airport. They wouldn't have Secret Service and a true presidential motorcade (i.e., "the Beast").
I was disappointed that Monkey Werx excused Biden's lack of Air Force 1 use by saying it has to be retooled and stressing it's normal. Yet...the "Biden Administration" had time to wallpaper the White House.
Any military aircraft the President flies on becomes Air Force 1 and I'd think an aircraft enthusiast like Monkey Werx would know that. I mean, does Marine 1 need new wallpaper too? Does the military's entire fleet of suitable aircraft have to be redone? I wonder how long Biden will be "stranded" without a ride?