“I’ve read the inflamed, angry responses here, and I wonder what I’d missed in the original article.
So I reread it.
The author points out - correctly - that:
(1) Trump was not reinstalled this year.
(2) The author does not deny that fraud took place, or the effect of that fraud.
He points out that those who claimed it would be Trump taking the oath on January 20 were wrong.
And he’s right.”
Some here are claiming the author said things that he actually didn’t say. IMHO, the false prophets are part of the group of traitors who walk amongst us pretending to be on our side.
I've used Brown's own words, genius. Want more?
I think that's true, unfortunately, they've sucked a whole group of people into buying their scam by telling them exactly what they want to hear.
One thing I've heard is: a false prophet is evil and deliberately malicious. Therefore, a well-meaning "prophet" who merely makes a mistake can still be help out as a prophet.
That's absurd - you're either prophetic or your not. You can be a very nice guy, but also not be the prophet you think you are. Once you refuse to accept that, then you become dangerous in the false prophet sense.
As far as those changing their "prophesy" from "January 20, 2021" to "some time in the future," those are like the people who predict the end of the world on a certain day, then when it doesn't happen, just shift that day further down the road.
At some point you've got to take the red pill and get off the magical thinking.
Yeah, I didn’t read all of the posts in this thread, but for those that I did read all I could think was “Did these folks read the same article I did?”