It’s more of the same delusional BS that’s been trafficked here and elsewhere for the last 2 1/2 months.
Are you a lawyer versed in that area of law?
One of the articles I linked to stated:
See my previous reports for case law and analysis of the federal quo warranto statute. The bottom line is that SCOTUS has held that an election of any United States official can be challenged based on fraud or error by a writ of quo warranto. And the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the proper venue to challenge the election of a sitting President is the D.C. District Court. We have a statute. We have a venue. Bring the receipts, President Trump
If you have a legal opinion contrary to the above, please share it with us.