Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

I am sure I was impetuous and went to his defense here tonight too soon...

My original contention to confront him was because Q is not going to be supported through vociferous clown acts and I rose to Q’s defense that particular day.

Alex Jones is reported to have clobbered him without mercy during a recent one on one interview. I have yet to watch it but plan to do so soon.

I understand that Jake is way out there in many of his notions. They seem to be based on nonsense so representing Q is not a good look. Q warned us of Q balls.

I guess in hind sight buying him a beer might be seen as rewarding bad behavior.

I remain vigilant but wish to learn more...


253 posted on 01/17/2021 6:35:16 PM PST by freepersup (“Those who conceal crimes are preparing to commit new ones.” ~Vuk Draskovic~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]


To: freepersup

It does seem as though his “Q” represenation is meant to discredit, esp. because of the Capitol thing - did you see the video (linked on the previous thread) of Jake coming into the Capitol and the Cap. cops not in the least put out by it? Paraphrasing what someone posted of course.


264 posted on 01/17/2021 6:41:52 PM PST by little jeremiah (Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson