[bagster]

Yes it does. Quidam lied and claimed he was an insider and knew what was going on. He claimed clinton was going down. I even think he claimed that “nothing can stop it”...

I see nothing in your shrill, hysterical diatribe that says Quidam was proven to be not what he/it purported to be.

You mistake the fact that we lost that round as proof that he didn't exist as advertised. It is not.

You seem to have some sort of functioning brain. Apply it to what I just said and actually think.

If Joe Frazier says he's gonna kick Cassius Clay's ass again in the rematch, and he loses, does that make him not Joe Frazier?

Hope that metaphor helps.

p.s. The same holds true for Q, in case you're wondering. Nothing is ever guaranteed in the face of a determined enemy with vast resources.

p.p.s. This is the real world, goodman.

Your low level thinking would be better received among your peers out beyond the trees. They might even think you're smart. Give it a try.

[Reverend Wright]

Quidam told us to “Trust Starr”, “Trust Starr”, then “Trust Gingrich”, “Trust Hastert !”, “Trust Lott”

Quidam claimed conviction or a forced resignation would happen, the “men in suits” etc.

Then, when it didn’t happen Quidam explained it away by saying “many are compromised”

(Which actually was correct in Hastert’s case !)