The history of this is real
#48, #56
I can recount ‘real’ history with the best of them.
It’s not a question of whether or not a written history is ‘real’. It’s a question of whether two separate ‘real’ but similar histories are driven by the same ideology. In this case, they are not.
Now read #48 and #56 which are short but illuminating, then if you don’t ‘get it’, don’t expect a response b/c it would be a waste of time.