Replies

Enumerated, I understand your thoughts on the subject. But what I think needs to be pointed out is that there is this little item called a conviction. The whole impeachment affair has two parts.

The miserable demonicrat led House of Representatives send the process to the Senate for a possible conviction, if the impeachment part of the proceedings pass in the House. Nazi Pelousy can’t win a conviction against the President even though she tries.

Last time the only Republican to vote in favor of conviction, in the Senate, was mittens Romney. Even in the event (not going to happen) that the Senate would find a way to have a vote, there wouldn’t be enough votes from republicans to convict. It would take 60 votes to convict.

“It would take 60 votes to convict.”

Sixty-seven actually. I can assure you that they’d get to 67 easily this time. Our favorite RINOs are pretty much exposed now. I am pretty sure they’d get enough this time.

Exactly right.

The House part is merely a charge - an allegation. And since the allegation is so partisan, so hypocritical, so groundless and so inconsequential - everyone knows it is just for show.

They just want to give the fake news sound bites and try to put a stain on President Trump and his supporters.

But it won’t work, because getting “impeached” by corrupt Democrats and RINOs is really a compliment - like having Iran call the USA “Satan” for defending Israel.

Considering the source, it is a compliment - and I am sure the President sees it that way. He will wear this “impeachment” like a badge of honor.

The proof is President Trump’s landslide popular victory in 2020. He got a record 75m votes - probably closer to 80 million if you include the votes that were stolen. And that was less than a year after his first fake impeachment.

I really don’t think these fake impeachments do anything but help his popularity.