Listening to Trey Gowdy on request of a friend. He contradicts everything we have discussed here. He is a lawyer after all but lawyers take opposite sides. What he doesn’t really address that I can hear is the refusal of states to investigate voting irregularities and courts to refuse hearings. Are we supposed to trust all those refusals were fair or are we supposed to continue questioning because of all the info we have heard?
Gowdy is a derp. No better than Boehner.
He never accomplished anything while in congress.
The refusal to hear the legal cases was political. The courts didn’t want to hear the cases, and they used “standing” as their procedural excuse.
Attorney Robert Barnes talked about what happened with regard to legal standing several times in his videos on the Viva Frei YouTube channel (Viva Frei is a Canadian lawyer).
There is enough prima facie evidence of ineligible voters voting (dead people, non-citizens, underage, double voting, etc.) and other election shenanigans that several of the cases should have at least made it to the discovery phase.
How do you prove election / voter fraud when someone else has exclusive control over almost all of the evidence (machines, ballots, mail in envelopes, chain of custody logs, etc.)? It’s extremely difficult to do without discovery.
I don’t trust GOWDY at all anymore ... the only thing that stands on his side were “Q” posts that he is/was a patriot. He has since proven himself amongst the worst of the worst since then so either he’s among the best actors in this movie or he’s SCUM. TBD + WWG1WGA :)