They can change them retroactively if they want. It's not an ex post facto violation because it isn't a criminal violation. There is no constitutional limit to confiscation as long as it is labeled "tax."
They can change them retroactively if they want.
> They can change them retroactively if they want. It’s not an ex post facto violation because it isn’t a criminal violation. <
I looked it up. By golly, you’re right. The courts have already ruled that going back one year was fine and dandy. But what about going back more than one year? I could find no definitive ruling either way there.
So let’s say Biden/Harris want to go back five years, and impose additional taxes on us. Then I guess it would go to our wonderful Supreme Court. They’ll probably nod yes like a bunch of bobble-heads.
After all, it would be for the children. And for Mother Earth. And stuff.