Re: military action
If the President and elements of the National Security council (and therefore senior military) have intel that indicates collusion between any of Biden, Harris and/or Pelosi and the PRC, then they have
(a) a constitutional obligation to arrest them for treason
(b) a clear and present danger with the timetable for inauguration ticking down, to a point where Biden/Harris can and probably will remove from power (or worse) anyone who knows anything incriminating, and will destroy that evidence.
It could well be that things have reached this stage — evidence has been assembled that points to collusion between the PRC and some senior person close to these public figures, for example, Hunter Biden. The challenge then is, should the treason be limited to those surrogates, or can the charge stick to the real targets?
And yes this is big time realpolitik and not a movie script.
It could end in two different ways:
(a) Trump gets the generals to agree, and they move with military force to arrest the traitors and coup plotters.
(b) The military lose their nerve, decide to cast their lot with the traitors, and leave Trump out to dry.
Let’s pray that these military leaders would do their sworn duty and uphold the Constitution, assuming these are the facts (and there must be quite a high probability that these are the facts, if in fact there has been collusion, the NSA would be quite capable of uncovering it). The problem as always is the vast infiltration of all aspects of government and the military by deep state sympathizers and operatives.
Besides Trump, Hawley and Rush Limbaugh, what prominent public figures do you trust?
Jim jordan