Great find!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1045
Apr 06, 2018 3:27:43 PM EDT
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 03213a No. 922343
Apr 06, 2018 3:24:13 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: 1e1537 No. 922280
Apr 06, 2018 3:22:28 PM EDT
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 03213a No. 922237
>>922142
Fake pic push by MSM.
Videos / backup.
Google kill.
YouTube kill.
FB kill.
Twitter kill.
Yahoo kill.
Bing kill.
Instagram kill.
Net will be paused.
HAMMER.
On the clock.
Q
>>922237
How soon?
>>922280
We don’t inform our enemies of the specifics.
We instead instill fear in them to make unplanned and disastrous countermoves.
Q
WHY DOESN’T THIS COUNT??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Supreme Court unanimously overturns North Carolina’s ban on social-media use by sex offenders (PACKINGHAM v. NORTH CAROLINA 2017)
...”It wasn’t even a close call. The court (Justice Anthony M. Kennedy writing for himself and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. concurring joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Clarence Thomas) described the statutory prohibition as “unprecedented in the scope of First Amendment speech it burdens.”
[S]ocial media users employ these websites to engage in a wide array of protected First Amendment activity on topics “as diverse as human thought.” … Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate with one another about it on any subject that might come to mind. By prohibiting sex offenders from using those websites, North Carolina with one broad stroke bars access to what for many are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge. These websites can provide perhaps the most powerful mechanisms available to a private citizen to make his or her voice heard. They allow a person with an Internet connection to “become a town crier with a voice that resonates farther than it could from any soapbox.” … [T]o foreclose access to social media altogether is to prevent the user from engaging in the legitimate exercise of First Amendment rights.”...