I'm definitely not "following" him -- because I "follow" no one.
OTOH, I daresay neither of us fully understands the personal/tactical rules that E C-W chooses to follow...
Don't get "wrapped around the axle" by reading too much into a simple, informative post. (Generic advice to all of us...) [MI term: "Overinterpretation"]
Blessings! :-)
W W G 1 W G A !
TXnMA
Begging your pardon, but did I — anywhere — advocate “following””@GhostEzra”?
I’m definitely not “following” him — because I “follow” no one.
OTOH, I daresay neither of us fully understands the personal/tactical rules that E C-W chooses to follow...
Don’t get “wrapped around the axle” by reading too much into a simple, informative post. (Generic advice to all of us...) [MI term: “Overinterpretation”]
Blessings! :-)
W W G 1 W G A !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’m not getting wrapped around the axle; I just need to write better. Whatever word choice I employed was not intended to say that you follow him, or anyone.
I addressed my my belief that GhostEzra is not true Q to our readers (e.g., “FReeQs).
In this case, we don’t need to fully understand the personal/tactical rules that ECW chooses to follow. They knew we would not have access to that information and just gave us (mercifully) simpler rules: “No outside comms” and “Be careful who you follow”.
Blessings to you and to all FReeQs here, watchin’ and prayin’.